Originally posted by cciowa:
i do not think you cut a known commodity for a total question mark. no matter what you thought of him before he came here. if we trade back and accumulate more picks. fine maybe . but as of now. we can not afford to waste a pick on a running back when we have other needs like secondary. esp if they let ward walk and since we have no clue whats up with sanders. we may need a pick at wide out. maybe we need another d lineman. and we all know we need some picks for the o line. .
You're Missing the pt.
Let me explain it...
SO You'd rather cut JM eat $4M in DM & keep Coleman at $5M (thats $9m invested in just two RBs one isn't even on the team)...plus they're gonna be paying Mostert/breida (combined) another $5M for the 2020 season. That's $14M for a position that we've seen we can find talent from late day 3/UDFA prospects. What you're saying to do doesn't make financial sense based on where they're at cap wise.
What I'm saying is restructure JM SO THAT he has very little GTD cash and it's all incentive based. That's gonna save SF like $6M or so. SF will get a chance to see if he's healthy an can play. IF not they cut him and don't have to eat $4M in DM. Cap savings!
Yes cut Coleman because he's a known commodity...of avg play. You don't think SF can find someone to take his 130 snaps? They have a bunch of late day 3 picks which is perfect for finding CHEAP scheme specific RBs.
Take that extra $10M+ you saved by restructuring JM and cutting Coleman and spend it on Sanders or another position you're saying we better play at.