WR Dante "Do something...anything" Pettis

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
What's the latest on Hurd's return?

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Good point, but I am looking at the logjam of POTENTIALLY talented receivers the Niners have with Goodwin, Pettis, Taylor, Hurd and Deebo all in line for playing time. The Niners only need 3-4 good WR's since they have Kittle and Juice out there as well. It's a question at this point of who is a tradeable chip (i.e. Thomas) with value. Sorry to say, but at this point Pettis is the odd man out.

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Good point, but I am looking at the logjam of POTENTIALLY talented receivers the Niners have with Goodwin, Pettis, Taylor, Hurd and Deebo all in line for playing time. The Niners only need 3-4 good WR's since they have Kittle and Juice out there as well. It's a question at this point of who is a tradeable chip (i.e. Thomas) with value. Sorry to say, but at this point Pettis is the odd man out.

Kyle still waiting for someone to step up.

Pettis seems to need reps but it is a catch-22: Until he starts catching the ball Jimmy isn't going to throw to him much.

Originally posted by ltrain:

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Good point, but I am looking at the logjam of POTENTIALLY talented receivers the Niners have with Goodwin, Pettis, Taylor, Hurd and Deebo all in line for playing time. The Niners only need 3-4 good WR's since they have Kittle and Juice out there as well. It's a question at this point of who is a tradeable chip (i.e. Thomas) with value. Sorry to say, but at this point Pettis is the odd man out.

Kyle still waiting for someone to step up.

Pettis seems to need reps but it is a catch-22: Until he starts catching the ball Jimmy isn't going to throw to him much.

More like a drop-22 amirite?

Originally posted by genus49:

Pettis needs to pick his game up but I guess people are forgetting the huge TD catch he had vs the Steelers?

It was a clear run before you secure the catch situation and the kid was trying to do too much. He's still talented. Maybe don't trust him as a #1 WR but damn 49er fans are quick to bury talented players who need to sort their stuff out.

Originally posted by ltrain:

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Good point, but I am looking at the logjam of POTENTIALLY talented receivers the Niners have with Goodwin, Pettis, Taylor, Hurd and Deebo all in line for playing time. The Niners only need 3-4 good WR's since they have Kittle and Juice out there as well. It's a question at this point of who is a tradeable chip (i.e. Thomas) with value. Sorry to say, but at this point Pettis is the odd man out.

Kyle still waiting for someone to step up.

Pettis seems to need reps but it is a catch-22: Until he starts catching the ball Jimmy isn't going to throw to him much.

More like a drop-22 amirite?

Originally posted by NinerGM:

Well I don't know English. I still think next years #1 needs to be tackle. IMHO. We're covering quite a bit for Skule with scheme. We're not leaving him out on an island out there. At some point, to open the playbook, you're going to have to stop covering players.

As far as Pettis is concerned, I think he's in danger of losing reps if he isn't already.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NinerGM:
Well I don't know English. I still think next years #1 needs to be tackle. IMHO. We're covering quite a bit for Skule with scheme. We're not leaving him out on an island out there. At some point, to open the playbook, you're going to have to stop covering players.

As far as Pettis is concerned, I think he's in danger of losing reps if he isn't already.

LOL. Yes. Investing in the OL in talent and depth might be a sound strategy. Ha

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:
Will she ever be a true #1 Wide receiver? So inconsistent

Originally posted by AB81Rules:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NinerGM:

Well I don't know English. I still think next years #1 needs to be tackle. IMHO. We're covering quite a bit for Skule with scheme. We're not leaving him out on an island out there. At some point, to open the playbook, you're going to have to stop covering players.

As far as Pettis is concerned, I think he's in danger of losing reps if he isn't already.

LOL. Yes. Investing in the OL in talent and depth might be a sound strategy. Ha

Agreed NC and NinerGM, we need to get OL depth early and often in 2020 draft.

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:

Will she ever be a true #1 Wide receiver? So inconsistent

We don't need a true #1 WR with the way Kyle scheme's up plays, and our running game is the way it is.

And why call Dante She? Why do so many have an issue with him? He made a mental mistake, it happens, people need to get over it.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NinerGM:

Well I don't know English. I still think next years #1 needs to be tackle. IMHO. We're covering quite a bit for Skule with scheme. We're not leaving him out on an island out there. At some point, to open the playbook, you're going to have to stop covering players.

As far as Pettis is concerned, I think he's in danger of losing reps if he isn't already.

LOL. Yes. Investing in the OL in talent and depth might be a sound strategy. Ha

Agreed NC and NinerGM, we need to get OL depth early and often in 2020 draft.

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:

Will she ever be a true #1 Wide receiver? So inconsistent

We don't need a true #1 WR with the way Kyle scheme's up plays, and our running game is the way it is.

And why call Dante She? Why do so many have an issue with him? He made a mental mistake, it happens, people need to get over it.

Originally posted by Chief:

Did y'all see the OBJ and Pettis jersey exchange?