Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 468 users in the forums

Khalil Mack thread

Shop 49ers game tickets

Khalil Mack thread

Aug 17, 2018 at 1:33 PM
  • jcs
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,257
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The Patriots trading us Jimmy G made sense.

This wouldn't.

trading away a young franchise QB never makes sense...in most cases.

It makes sense when you have (in most people's eyes) the greatest QB ever already starting for you.
Not when he's in his 40's. MVP season for Brady or not it was trading away their future. Like the exact opposite of what we did with Joe and Steve that maintained our dominance for nearly another decade.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:11 PM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

So a 2019 1st, 2020 2nd, armstead, and Ward is what Forbes sport money says.

I mean I'd do that in a heartbeat...I can't see Oakland taking on ward's contract (we could eat some of it)

While I believe the Raiders would be complete idiots for trading one of the top 5 defensive players in the entire game all in the name of a contract dispute (pay that man), which makes this whole thing still seem like more of a pipe dream, if that was the asking price...you bet your @$$ I'd do that trade.

Yeah I can't see how they don't pay him...they have nothing for cap space right now (that s**t can be manipulated). It's just mind boggling how they don't have something done or didn't plan to have the money for it.

Can you imagine lynch/Kyle trading for jimmy G and Mack lol?

Yep spotrac projects the Raiders to have about 45 mil next season not including anything they carry over this season. Teams don't just let bonafide superstar players go unless there is something unlawful involved or a bigger underlying issue. To trade him over a contract dispute would be stupid. You draft to find studs like this. Then when you find them, you pay them. That's how this works.

But hey if they wanna ship him over this way...by all means.
Aug 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,251
Originally posted by NYniner85:

So a 2019 1st, 2020 2nd, armstead, and Ward is what Forbes sport money says.

I mean I'd do that in a heartbeat...I can't see Oakland taking on ward's contract (we could eat some of it)
Raiders: "Remove AA and Ward and we have a deal"
Aug 17, 2018 at 9:37 PM
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The Patriots trading us Jimmy G made sense.

This wouldn't.

trading away a young franchise QB never makes sense...in most cases.

It makes sense when you have (in most people's eyes) the greatest QB ever already starting for you.
Not when he's in his 40's. MVP season for Brady or not it was trading away their future. Like the exact opposite of what we did with Joe and Steve that maintained our dominance for nearly another decade.

Aug 18, 2018 at 7:11 AM
Bears or packers in the lead to land him.
Aug 18, 2018 at 7:48 AM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 65,646
Originally posted by 49erWill:
Bears or packers in the lead to land him.

where you seeing this at?
Aug 18, 2018 at 8:01 AM
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by 49erWill:
Bears or packers in the lead to land him.

where you seeing this at?

My phone.

Aug 18, 2018 at 8:46 AM
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The Patriots trading us Jimmy G made sense.

This wouldn't.

trading away a young franchise QB never makes sense...in most cases.

It makes sense when you have (in most people's eyes) the greatest QB ever already starting for you.
Not when he's in his 40's. MVP season for Brady or not it was trading away their future. Like the exact opposite of what we did with Joe and Steve that maintained our dominance for nearly another decade.

This
Aug 18, 2018 at 9:01 AM
Originally posted by NYniner85:

So a 2019 1st, 2020 2nd, armstead, and Ward is what Forbes sport money says.

I mean I'd do that in a heartbeat...I can't see Oakland taking on ward's contract (we could eat some of it)

That is offering the farm?
Aug 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM
Originally posted by 49erWill:
My phone.


Love to know what that's based on lol.
Aug 18, 2018 at 9:24 AM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Love to know what that's based on lol.

I'm guessing cause the Packers gave two 1sts. And that's it
Aug 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Love to know what that's based on lol.

I'm guessing cause the Packers gave two 1sts. And that's it

Pretty sure no one gave anything yet it's just Vegas odds
Aug 18, 2018 at 10:49 AM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Love to know what that's based on lol.

I'm guessing cause the Packers gave two 1sts. And that's it

Pretty sure no one gave anything yet it's just Vegas odds

Maybe he meant "have"
Aug 18, 2018 at 11:00 AM
When have the Packers ever made a blockbuster trade or fa signing. Just not how they operate.
Aug 18, 2018 at 11:08 AM
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
When have the Packers ever made a blockbuster trade or fa signing. Just not how they operate.

Reggie white?????

Jk that's all I got lol.
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone