Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NCommand:
This is my thread. You're not allowed to bump it irresponsibly. LOL.
Remember, this is the year we should be matching their production from last year if Lynch had done enough. Let's revisit after the season.
Go Niners!
Actually this is the year where they should be matching their production in 2017 since that was Pace's third season as GM. In 2017 the Bears went 5-11 so I'm hopeful that the 49ers can top that.
They easily should eclipse that and that would be terrific!
The OP outlined the myriad of comparisons as to why I originally started this little project.
You define a rebuild the moment a new GM walks in the door and I tend to define it more on the backend...when a GM finally acquires a FQB (that roster snapshot in time - comparing the rosters then and going forward) as that's when GM's tend to get more serious about winning and show more urgency.
But even that's not apples to apples here because Lynch has a 6 year contract so even when they were incredibly fortunate to get a FQB in year 2, we didn't see the same Pace-like urgency like Pace showed when he acquired Trubisky. Had Lynch had a 3 year contract and he acquired JG in year 2, that next offseason may have been more Pace-like aggressive.
While a fun exercise, it's very difficult to find two teams to compare apples to apples rebuilds at the same exact time both with their FQB's in the building, similar cap space, etc.
Chicago was the closest I could find ATT in terms of line items...number of quality adopted players, draft slots, cap space, FQB acquired, etc. but in the end, both GM's have very different strategies and philosophies and the roster builds have followed that model breaking up this little project.
[ Edited by NCommand on Sep 18, 2019 at 7:33 AM ]