Robert Kraft Named In Prostitution Sting

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

if it were a regular ole escort/call girl this shouldn't be a big deal. But if it is actually a human trafficking case then oh boy the pats are in danger.

Originally posted by GMniner805:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by GMniner805:

Originally posted by Jcool:
Your opinion is wrong.

Opinions can't be right or wrong bud..

I'd bet opioids have done more damage to Florida than rub and tugs.

Yes they can which is why yours are.

Have you ever lost a friend or family member to an opioid addiction?? I have.

Never lost one to a rub and tug.

While sad, it was their choice to do so.

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Originally posted by WINiner:

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Oldest profession in the world lol...when you see an old billionaire dating a hot model it's baically him paying for sex end of the day. No way she "loves" him and thinks he's attractive. They see the cash.

Originally posted by Jcool:

ugh ... pic.twitter.com/hki37EFcr7

— Don Cheadle (@DonCheadle) February 22, 2019

smh..

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

I agree with that. If it was legal the traffickers would not have much of a market. It's ironic.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

I agree with that. If it was legal the traffickers would not have much of a market. It's ironic.

damn imagine if they legalize it though? They will probably tax the hell out of it.

Originally posted by gold49digger:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

I agree with that. If it was legal the traffickers would not have much of a market. It's ironic.

damn imagine if they legalize it though? They will probably tax the hell out of it.

Probably so. But it would provide an avenue for those who want to make money in a safe environment and those who want the experience without criminal penalty.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

I agree with that. If it was legal the traffickers would not have much of a market. It's ironic.

Not sure I agree. Isnt that the problem in Amsterdam?

Al Butler‏Verified account @ALaboutSportsFollowFollow @ALaboutSports
More
Sources told ESPN that Robert Kraft is "not the biggest name involved" in this investigation.
10:01 AM - 22 Feb 2019

Tiger Woods -120 Jerry Jones +200 Ron Mexico +600 Any of Migos +800 Meek Mill +900 Donald Trump +1000

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by WINiner:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Tax it and regulate it. This is totally stupid to criminalize people for this. If personal use of Marijuana is legal than why not this?

Yes trafficking is wrong. But that is on the pimps and traffickers if that is what is happening. Simple soliciting for a older lonely guy is so stupid to criminalize. As long as it's consenting adults and he is paying them and they want to be paid why is that wrong? We live in such a strange society. In Europe, Asia, South America, Central America, Mexico and Africa such transactions are in large part just considered legal. Again as long as it's 2 consenting ADULTS and no trafficking involved.

But we live in a very weird puritanical society where we try to regulate everybody on morality.

Again human trafficking is wrong if that is what is happening and that's a whole different thing. But a transaction between 2 adults. Person A wants an experience. Person B wants some money. They agree on the exchange. They are both adults. They practice safe practices. How is this wrong and why is this wrong for society? This seems so stupid to me. People in Amsterdam would just think we are completely crazy and out of our minds.

"What once looked like a revolutionary approach to prostitution in Holland is now clearly seen as a disaster, by all except those who seek to make a profit"

So? You found 1 article by 1 lady who doesn't like it. Wow. Cool story bro. I can find 10,000 articles in support of it and how it works too. So what's your point? Your article is 1 opinion piece by 1 lady.

If you are paying for sex it is likely from an exploited woman or a severe drug addict in all likelihood.

Not necessarily. It can be a person who wants to make a high dollar amount for their time. Much more than they can earn otherwise. Many feminists actually support this because they say it allows women to be in control of how they make money and how they choose to live. As long as it is taxed, regulated and safe practices of course. Certainly no human trafficking. But you can regulate that out in a regulated situation. People must be certified, registered, regulated, confirmed, verified. That they are not trafficked. That they do this of their free will to make money.

Keeping prostitution illegal is why we have human trafficking in some ways.

I agree with that. If it was legal the traffickers would not have much of a market. It's ironic.

Not sure I agree. Isnt that the problem in Amsterdam?

The great majority of Amsterdam is NOT trafficked. A lot of it is local Dutch ladies who want to make some big money. You can always find one example and that will be the example the media will jump on. It's confirmation bias. You see it in the media all the time. If they find 1 they should prosecute it. But you deal with that one off. Nobody wants human trafficking. Nobody. That's absolutely terrible. Everybody agrees on this. Nobody argues that point.