Will he take away development time from Bourne learning how to creatively drop important balls?
Yeah. So?
[ Edited by brodiebluebanaszak on Mar 10, 2021 at 3:09 PM ]
There are 323 users in the forums
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I think if we have a chance to sign sanders for 4 to 5m we should do it. He's a classy guy and a perennial top 20 receiver.gives instant credibility to every route on our route tree.
Will he take away development time from Bourne learning how to creatively drop important balls?
Yeah. So?
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Sanders is 34 and I'm sure he can still produce but it would take time from our receiving group.
Not trying to start a fight but what receiving group?
We have just signed River Craft for goodness sake and at this point it's likely he'll make the team.
Deebo, Bourne and Aiyuk? Bourne may not be back. Deebo has had nagging injuries and has missed a lot of time. Aiyuk had a great rookie season but he too missed time. Trent Taylor? River Craft? Travis Benjamin?
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Sanders is 34 and I'm sure he can still produce but it would take time from our receiving group.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Sanders is 34 and I'm sure he can still produce but it would take time from our receiving group.
Not trying to start a fight but what receiving group?
We have just signed River Craft for goodness sake and at this point it's likely he'll make the team.
Deebo, Bourne and Aiyuk? Bourne may not be back. Deebo has had nagging injuries and has missed a lot of time. Aiyuk had a great rookie season but he too missed time. Trent Taylor? River Craft? Travis Benjamin?
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
You want to pay 4 to 5 million a year for a guy to be the 3rd receiver?
I won't say that we are "set" at receiver. But that's a high number for a number 3 guy. I do view Sanders as a guy that can start if needed, but our cap space is limited. That is my only real issue with this. If we can somehow get him for a value around what Bourne would've gotten, I'll take that. Otherwise, get a younger and lower cost option.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
You want to pay 4 to 5 million a year for a guy to be the 3rd receiver?
I won't say that we are "set" at receiver. But that's a high number for a number 3 guy. I do view Sanders as a guy that can start if needed, but our cap space is limited. That is my only real issue with this. If we can somehow get him for a value around what Bourne would've gotten, I'll take that. Otherwise, get a younger and lower cost option.
I would gladly eat an additional three million of our cap space to drop bourne and add Sanders. He would not be a number three guy at all. Go to Trent see if he can help us carve out a couple mil for this dude who is a winner and has a long proven history of catching balls
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I think if we have a chance to sign sanders for 4 to 5m we should do it. He's a classy guy and a perennial top 20 receiver.gives instant credibility to every route on our route tree.
Will he take away development time from Bourne learning how to creatively drop important balls?
Yeah. So?