Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Try to take your emotions out of the conversation.
Good advice for everyone. If nothing else, it allows all of us highly-compensated mods to sit back consider where we will spend all our cash.
I just dont understand the logic. Is it really "hate" that I prefer an actual seasoned QB coach? Our franchise has a lot riding on the development of Trey Lance. I would prefer the QB coach to help teach him be someone with experience. But somehow, thats taken as hate.
To be candid, a bit of it may be your well-known disregard for Smith as a player. The rest of it is the current cultural preference to see disagreement as "hate," which is a perversion of the actual meaning of hate, and one I personally believe shows intellectual laziness. (Now that I have said that, let the flaming begin.
)
As to the matter of qualifications of QB coaches; a quick check around the league shows the large majority of QB coaches are quite inexperienced. 3 years or less is rather the norm. In a number of other cases, the "QB coach" also has other responsibilities. ie., assistant offensive coordinator/run game, or the like. The Rams guy is in his third year total, and, judging by Goff's miserable time there, he did nothing to help that kid. 49er Rich Scangarello, with 7 years total experience in the pros, is one of the most experienced in the NFL, and four of those years were not specifically as QB coach. In short, the position of NFL QB coach is one of the lesser lights on the coaching tree.
So, I wonder, with the dearth of good QBs around the league, is a part of it a lack of focus on the tutelage being provided for young coaches, and even the vets? It seems coaching may be getting lip service that is not demonstrated in experienced quality QB coaches.