Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Hopper:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by SFrush:
SMH Calling him a two down player because he's not consistently playing 70-80 percent of the snaps like Buckner did is a flawed argument.
No, I'm calling him a 2 down player because he's taking roughly (less than) 66% of the defensive snaps which is 2 of 3 snaps.
But that isn't the definition of two down player with regards to DL. A two down DL comes off the field on 3rd downs... this kid has been getting plenty of 3rd down opportunities.
I don't see what the problem is with Kinlaw playing 60 some percent of the defensive snaps.
Yeah that was my definition of a two down DL.
LOL. Given it's a passing league, every down is a passing down. I've always focused on the correlated snap counts. Define it however you'd like but, math. Hell, break those snaps down by the splits on 1st, 2nd and 3rd down for all I care. I want my #15 on every down minus the occasional rotation. He's not a 1T. He's a 3T.
It may be a passing league but every down is certainly not a passing down. No one wants to be one dimensional.