Originally posted by LayTheWoodall:
If we're talking about a short time span, Marshall Faulk comes to mind
He shouldnt. His time span was not short. Over an 8 year stretch, he averaged 1860 yards and 14 touchdowns.
There are 367 users in the forums
Greatest Running Backs of All Time - peak skills over 3-5 year stretch (not on longevity)
Greatest Running Backs of All Time - peak skills over 3-5 year stretch (not on longevity)
Jul 15, 2020 at 5:08 PM
- SteveWallacesHelmet
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,797
He shouldnt. His time span was not short. Over an 8 year stretch, he averaged 1860 yards and 14 touchdowns.
Jul 15, 2020 at 8:56 PM
- LayTheWoodall
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,151
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Originally posted by LayTheWoodall:If we're talking about a short time span, Marshall Faulk comes to mind
He shouldnt. His time span was not short. Over an 8 year stretch, he averaged 1860 yards and 14 touchdowns.
This is true, however I was specifically referring to the GSOT years where he was probably the most visible player in the NFL for a 3 year span. He didn't get much attention playing for those lousy colts teams. Though I do personally remember him, Manning and Harrison coming into "3com" in 1998 and nearly upsetting us.
Jul 17, 2020 at 12:17 PM
- TheRickestRick
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,411
Brian Westbrook could get an honorable mention, not in the all-time debate but in terms of importance to a team. Faulk picked up the bar of RBs in the passing game and Westbrook ran away with it. Aside from the brief TO phase, I cant name another McNabb era receiver outside of big brother Celek. The offense went through Westbrook for most of that eagle era.