Originally posted by Gabberwocky:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by RickyRoma:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Yes, I'd trade Bosa for an NFL proven FQB.
But not for a prospect. Just imagine if that prospect busts. Now you're out of your elite, game-wrecking, NFL-proven edge rusher and still need a QB. You've created a need at 2nd most important position while still needing the most important position. derp.
No brainer, but those guys listed are first ballot guys (Luck could've been). In this day and age, given the rules and such, the QB determines wins and losses moreso than at any other time in history. Forget about Bosa....you give up any single player in NFL history for an established Peyton Manning. Have to say that I would seriously consider Bosa plus in a hypothetical trade to get Manning in a draft, given his status coming out.
But Bosa and company had us in perfect position to win the SB versus who is widely regarded as the best in the business now.
A great defense gives you a better chance at a SB than the misconception of the "FQB" ESPECIALLY after that QB gets paid.
We lost because the QB, and they won because their QB. I say this makes FQB more important.
If that's how you see it, then that's how you see it.
Truth is KC's batted down 3 balls on critical downs with wide open guys behind them on 2 of our last 3 possessions. Plus that big lollipop pass to Hill was due to blown assignment by Moseley.
So you can give KCs QB all the credit and JG all the blame but the game was decided by both defenses.