Originally posted by JTB1974:
Originally posted by Silky:
He certainly looked good, but the Eagles really suck. He did what he should have. I'll admit he should have a bunch more yards but Harry dropped a perfectly thrown deep ball. The Eagles starting D is trash. Think about their backups? They're poopie. I'd take that performance with a grain of salt
I read the Eagles board and they said their 2nd stringers are like 3rd stringers. So mac should have success in these type of games because it's like he is at bama again. Still if you at his overall stats in the two games without actually watching the games they don't look that impressive. 26-38 for 233 yards and 0 TD's vs 2nd and 3rd stringers. So say you can turns those two games into 1 single game and say those 2nd and 3rd stringers equals the worst defensive team in the league. Would 26-38 with 233 yards and no TD's be considered an impressive game? It would be alright but nothing that would be considered performance of the week honors.
yea man I hear ya. But this is what we do on forums. We freak out, over-analyze, crown someone, over-exaggerate, etc. We've all seen enough over the years to know what's real in the pre-season and what is not. Our approach to Lance is far different than the Pats approach to Mac. Shanahan is deliberately putting Lance in tough situations, have him sit back and read without scrambling, and play with second/third stringers. The Pats are in a legit and tight QB competition so they are calling these preseasons games more "real-life." We all know what we saw last Saturday is not the real gameplan for Lance in the regular season. I expected people to freak out and say we f*cked up passing on Lance. Next week we will probably be like "Damn! We got it right!"