LISTEN: Looking For The 49ers' New DC With Jason Aponte →

There are 271 users in the forums

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Shop 49ers game tickets

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bloodless:
People are so underrating Mac Jones right now. When you watch his tape of this past season, I don't get what there is not to like about him. He is accurate, can throw the deep ball, Has incredible footwork, Has great pocket awareness, can go through his progressions, and makes good decisions with the football. I feel like analysts are underrating him for two reasons.

1). There was the belief coming into this season for Alabama that he was average and a downgrade from Tua. When he started lighting it up this turned into , he only looks this good because of those WRs. This perception carried on way to long into the season and for some it still continues to this day.

2). Analysts/scouts are currently way over rating having elite Arm strength/ball velocity and the ability to run with the football. Both of which Mac Jones is better at then people give him credit for .It is why to this day people are still singing praise for Sam Darnold, even though he has been terrible. Remember Deshaun Watson's big criticism when he was being drafted was his ball velocity. People are now overrating players who have elite levels of these qualities and underrating players who do not have elite levels of these qualities. Again, Mac Jones is a way better Athlete then people give him credit for and has way more then enough Arm strength to be successful at the NFL level.

I have said it before but If 49ers were able to land a QB prospect at the level of Mac Jones at #12 it will be an absolute steal.

Nah people are overrating Mac Jones.

if ball velocity/athletic ability/extending plays and having those god given traits didn't matter then Mahomes/allen/herbert etc wouldn't have been top 10 picks... those things matter.

im sorry wut with Sam Darnold? He doesn't have some cannon or elite athletic ability. That's simply not true at all....poor example. Name me a QB with Jones' same attributes (how he wins) drafted in the past five yrs that's been successful? There isn't any.

yes let's talk about Watson...go look at some of his OTHER weaknesses.

-doesn't go through progressions
-not accurate overall
-one read then runs
-TO machine
-can't read coverages
-stare down his primary read
-needs better footwork

Hmmm, wild he learned how to read coverages, learned the nuances of playing QB from the neck up AND still had that athletic traits to extend plays when he had too...turned into a top 5 QB. Weird how that works.

look if you think we don't have the coaching staff to teach a high trait QB, who already has a good base and understanding of football then go get Mac...and probably fire your coaching staff....If you don't think we have a roster built to support a top end QB for a yr until Kyle can get him fully adjusted and don't have a starting QB on the roster...go get Jones, not the case here. It's about upgrading from Jimmy G, not maintaining the status quo.

QBs picked in the 1st should be a long-term investments...it shouldn't just be about what they can do right now, but what they can ultimately become.

You are right that mobile QBs have had the success coming out of the draft recently while the pure pocket passers have not. I will give you that. But I think that is why people are underrating Mac. Also, most of those Qbs other then Jamis Winston did not have success at the college level while Mac has. When you watch Macs tape this past year. There is nothing not to like other then the fact that he is not super athletic and doesn't run with the football. I don't like the mindset of Mobile Qb Vs pure pocket passer. I see an elite QB that is what I want. I personally think he is an elite talent. You might not but that is alright. But lets not pretend pure pocket passers who don't have elite athletic ability don't have success in the NFL. The last 20 Superbowl champions. 17 of the 20 of those QBs were pure pocket passers. all of which that I am mentioning had way less athletic ability then Mac Jones.

Darnold is a good example. All people did was praise him for his Arm talent and ability to roll out with his legs. Because of this they overlooked the fact that he cant read defenses and make sound decisions with the ball.

Watsons biggest criticism was his arm strength/ arm talent. I do remember that. That is why I mentioned it because clearly he does have the arm strength for the NFL level.

I am not saying we cannot coach up up a player with Athletic traits and elite arm talent. But it can be very hard to teach some of the skill sets that Mac already posses.It can also be harder sometimes to teach those skill sets like footwork to a Mobile QB because they have a tendency to bail out of a pocket instead of move from within it. No, Mac Jones will never be Mahomes but he can be Matt Ryan and Dare I say you never know he could be the next Tom Brady.

I agree Qbs should be a long term investment. Based off that logic pocket passers probably have a longer shelf life. But again I am not against mobile Qbs either.
Originally posted by genus49:
I didn't actually read this part before lol.

People completely overreacted to Watson after the guy was pretty much the consensus #1 pick heading into his last season. You had the tape and yet people freaked out over stupid chit like his MPH numbers at the combine and INT numbers which includes a bunch of bad bounces.

And yes Watson addressed a lot of the questions around him, much like Mahomes did. Did Kap? Did RG3? Vince Young? Cam Newton? Mariota? etc..

But this comes back to my preference that Kyle would take Lance over Jones. Because the way coaches can get a better feel for whether a guy can do those things when not doing them in college is getting him in the room(or zoom) and testing his knowledge/commitment, talking to coaches, etc. Was the design of the offense holding the kid back? Were his coaches telling him how to operate the offense? We know most college offenses rely more on athletic ability so we'll see more and more guys who aren't big on going through progressions. Perfect world you want them going to their first read because it's open as drawn up.

Kap was not a natural throwing QB, he was a pure athlete that played in the pistol. He also had s**t coaching him. Harbs isn't some QB whisper. I still don't think he's a s**tty as some in here think.

RG3 won OROY then got his knee destroyed. Mariota dealt with numerous injuries while playing on a s**t team, I mean ho was he throwing the ball too? Still made the playoffs and imo can start in this league. Looked pretty darn good this yr in that one game. I think most rookie QBs should sit the first yr anyway, so they're actually prepared and confident with the play calls.

Newton won an MVP and made the Panthers a watchable team for yrs.

I'm sorry but what do any of those guys have to do with Fields/Lance outside of the fact that their black and athletic? Big deal they can actually move...that doesn't mean they can't play within the pocket and run an offense either.

I could throw out a whole bunch of white non-athletic QBs, with avg arms, who were regarded as accurate and "heady" coming out of college that did nothing as well....there's examples both ways.

Look I just think we have a coaching staff that can take a top end talent and turn them into a superstar...our team is setup to do that. I don't think Mac Jones is ever gonna be a top 10 QB in this league and that's what you should be looking for when drafting one this high. If I'm wrong I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time (amirite genus we were Solly's #1 fans lol).

there's film of Lance not throwing to just his first read, it was a lot of half field stuff though. He also was in charge of calling protections and audibles as a 19 yr old redshirt freshmen, I believe something like 66% of NFL completions are off of 1st reads and we have a HC that's can scheme guys open, so there's that....imo if he would have had a full season this yr I don't think we'd have a shot in hell to get him. I also think Fields is getting the Watson treatment.

Anyway we will see. Not trying to debate with you or anyone else in here about Jones anymore...everyone has made their decision and it is what it is at this point
Originally posted by Bloodless:
You are right that mobile QBs have had the success coming out of the draft recently while the pure pocket passers have not. I will give you that. But I think that is why people are underrating Mac. Also, most of those Qbs other then Jamis Winston did not have success at the college level while Mac has. When you watch Macs tape this past year. There is nothing not to like other then the fact that he is not super athletic and doesn't run with the football. I don't like the mindset of Mobile Qb Vs pure pocket passer. I see an elite QB that is what I want. I personally think he is an elite talent. You might not but that is alright. But lets not pretend pure pocket passers who don't have elite athletic ability don't have success in the NFL. The last 20 Superbowl champions. 17 of the 20 of those QBs were pure pocket passers. all of which that I am mentioning had way less athletic ability then Mac Jones.

Darnold is a good example. All people did was praise him for his Arm talent and ability to roll out with his legs. Because of this they overlooked the fact that he cant read defenses and make sound decisions with the ball.

Watsons biggest criticism was his arm strength/ arm talent. I do remember that. That is why I mentioned it because clearly he does have the arm strength for the NFL level.

I am not saying we cannot coach up up a player with Athletic traits and elite arm talent. But it can be very hard to teach some of the skill sets that Mac already posses.It can also be harder sometimes to teach those skill sets like footwork to a Mobile QB because they have a tendency to bail out of a pocket instead of move from within it. No, Mac Jones will never be Mahomes but he can be Matt Ryan and Dare I say you never know he could be the next Tom Brady.

I agree Qbs should be a long term investment. Based off that logic pocket passers probably have a longer shelf life. But again I am not against mobile Qbs either.

I'm not gonna get into jones' tape again I've said all I need to say about it...people get upset and I don't want to do that again. I'm not all about arguing at this point lol.

People praised Darnold for being able to throw from different platforms, outside of the pocket on the move etc...no one said Darnold had top arm talent overall.

Watson's biggest criticism was the system he played in, All the TOs, and no being able to read defenses...his velocity of his throw was only criticized after the combine when it was less than 50 mph. His ability to make plays off structure is what kept him alive while he was learning the nuances of playing the position at the NFL level.

I totally disagree it's hard to teach a QB how to read a defense and run a offense that you're given....also it's not like all the other 4 QBs are dummies that don't know the difference between man/zone or how to run a offense. They were all asked to run the offense they were given.

imo I don't think Jones is a top 10 QB talent. If I'm wrong I can live with that no problem
Originally posted by genus49:
You're telling me Tom Brady hasn't improved during his career? You're telling me Drew Brees hasn't?

Now they didn't suddenly turn into Patrick Mahomes but their arm got better and they were certainly good enough to make any NFL throw. Just because they couldn't make the highlight reel type stuff on the handful of plays doesn't mean much.

And not many QBs can make that 3rd and 15 play? That wasn't even one of his best plays. Hill was wide open and our guys were getting held like crazy.

Not to mention now you're acting like I wouldn't want Mahomes type QB, of course I would which is why I said i'd prefer we draft Lance over Jones but that's because I trust Shanahan's opinion much more than my own. It's because I'm not an NFL coach who understands how much can be fixed with a kid or have the insider knowledge some do.

I do know that Jones does things very well which will always lead to success in the NFL. I know we have a very good roster so are we ignoring a guy like Jones? Are we drafting him and then swapping rosters with the Jets?

We had a player who could do both in Kap. I'm sure you recall the hype around him(I know I was part of it) Ron Jaworski saying he was the next great QB. It never clicked for him. People can act like it's because he was blackballed by the league but that's BS. There's no question he had the work ethic, it was talked about frequently. The issue was his mental processing never got to the level you needed to make him a Mahomes like QB. Some plays he made were insane but then he'd miss the easy things.

We'll see what happens. All I'm saying is you're going out of your way to downplay what Jones has done while hyping up guys like Lance in relatable situations(see my post above)

Originally posted by genus49:

We'll see what happens. All I'm saying is you're going out of your way to downplay what Jones has done while hyping up guys like Lance in relatable situations(see my post above)

Nah I'm just stating how I feel about both prospects...I simply don't see Jones being a top 10 QB in the league and given my reasons.

everyone hypes up the prospect they like in here to some pt...you've done it with Solly and Ruggs (who I liked as well).

I did it with buck/Bosa Devante Parker/OBJ in pervious drafts too.
all that said McCorkle probably ends up a Niner
Originally posted by NYniner85:
all that said McCorkle probably ends up a Niner

Originally posted by NYniner85:
all that said McCorkle probably ends up a Niner

I doubt it

1) He goes in the top 11, which includes NE possibly trading up OR

2) He slips past 12 (49ers pass him up) and NE takes him at 15
Originally posted by ComeOnDeberg:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
all that said McCorkle probably ends up a Niner

I doubt it

1) He goes in the top 11, which includes NE possibly trading up OR

2) He slips past 12 (49ers pass him up) and NE takes him at 15
Or
3) 49ers trade up for the Mac Daddy.
Originally posted by evil:
Or
3) 49ers trade up for the Mac Daddy.

Mac Daddy lol



How about BIG Mac?
Originally posted by ComeOnDeberg:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
all that said McCorkle probably ends up a Niner

I doubt it

1) He goes in the top 11, which includes NE possibly trading up OR

2) He slips past 12 (49ers pass him up) and NE takes him at 15

3). Niners pounce on him at 12, and then as pre arranged ship Jimmy off to NE for a 2nd this year.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by evil:
Or
3) 49ers trade up for the Mac Daddy.

Mac Daddy lol



How about BIG Mac?

ew he sucked the heck outta that water
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by evil:
Or
3) 49ers trade up for the Mac Daddy.

Mac Daddy lol



How about BIG Mac?

Nope, unless he wins a Superbowl he can kick rocks!
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Nope, unless he wins a Superbowl he can kick rocks!

It was more a fat joke then anything lol. Kinda like "big Ben"
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by evil:
Or
3) 49ers trade up for the Mac Daddy.

Mac Daddy lol



How about BIG Mac?

If Jimmy has taught us anything, you aren't QB1 unless you can be sexualized by the fanbase.

Daddy Jones it is.
[ Edited by 49oz2superbowl on Mar 25, 2021 at 2:17 PM ]
Search Share 49ersWebzone