There are 245 users in the forums

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Shop 49ers game tickets

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Originally posted by NCommand:
It could be a monster success too. You look at all of the most successful QB's over the past 30 years and skill sets are all OVER the place from top physical traits to embarrassing physical traits to quick processors to slower processors to average skills across the board (master of none) to top in-your-face to quiet leadership skills, etc.

If there was one formula, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And to think YOU know now as a fan when professionals have come nowhere close to being good at these evaluations, is a bit much.

30 years ago Lamar Jackson is playing WR not winning an MVP as a QB. Times change. You either get on board or get left behind.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Steve Young: 'No question' that Zach Wilson is the 'first choice' of the 49ers

Is this where we say Steve is full of s**t and he's just pumping up an alumni?

i think thats obvious he's Tier 1B to Lawrence 1A. These 3 QBs we are talking about are all in the Tier 2.

I just dont see Jets passing on Wilson at all so its kind of a moot point even discussing drafting him imo
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
It could be a monster success too. You look at all of the most successful QB's over the past 30 years and skill sets are all OVER the place from top physical traits to embarrassing physical traits to quick processors to slower processors to average skills across the board (master of none) to top in-your-face to quiet leadership skills, etc.

If there was one formula, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And to think YOU know now as a fan when professionals have come nowhere close to being good at these evaluations, is a bit much.

The NFL isn't the same as it was 30 years ago... Rules are different, play calling is different, overall talent and WHO is learning to play QB at a young age is much different then 30 years ago.

The fact that there hasn't been a successful QB with his skill set drafted in the past 5 yrs is proof of that. There are dudes that can play like him that come out every yr, they just don't happen to play on Bama and put up stupid numbers like he did. Like I said if Jones played for Iowa he wouldn't be a top 10 pick, not even close.

Sure it is. You still had cannon arms like Elway with quick-release QB's like Marino and deep ball masters like Moon, insane athletes like Michael Vick, etc.

Today, they're just different names but varying skill sets remain, all over the place.
[ Edited by NCommand on Apr 2, 2021 at 8:08 AM ]
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by NCommand:
It could be a monster success too. You look at all of the most successful QB's over the past 30 years and skill sets are all OVER the place from top physical traits to embarrassing physical traits to quick processors to slower processors to average skills across the board (master of none) to top in-your-face to quiet leadership skills, etc.

If there was one formula, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And to think YOU know now as a fan when professionals have come nowhere close to being good at these evaluations, is a bit much.

30 years ago Lamar Jackson is playing WR not winning an MVP as a QB. Times change. You either get on board or get left behind.

LOL. You never heard of Michael Vick or Randall Cunningham?
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by NCommand:
It could be a monster success too. You look at all of the most successful QB's over the past 30 years and skill sets are all OVER the place from top physical traits to embarrassing physical traits to quick processors to slower processors to average skills across the board (master of none) to top in-your-face to quiet leadership skills, etc.

If there was one formula, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And to think YOU know now as a fan when professionals have come nowhere close to being good at these evaluations, is a bit much.

30 years ago Lamar Jackson is playing WR not winning an MVP as a QB. Times change. You either get on board or get left behind.

LOL. You never heard of Michael Vick or Randall Cunningham?

I wasn't sure but then you bolded them and it all clicked for me.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
No he said they had Mitch as their top QB I'm remember this. So even Kyle get's it wrong...there's a difference between a team evaluating a prospects for their team vs a guy like Bucky just evaluating a guy in a vacuum. Mahomes on the Jets could have been a flop all

Originally posted by NYniner85:
No he said they had Mitch as their top QB I'm remember this. So even Kyle get's it wrong...there's a difference between a team evaluating a prospects for their team vs a guy like Bucky just evaluating a guy in a vacuum. Mahomes on the Jets could have been a flop all the same.
That's meaningless at the end of the day Brooks ranked Mahomes with all of his elite traits as his 4th QB behind the likes of Trubisky & Kizer.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
You just compared a kid who's started 17 college games to Tom Brady. He's screwed. If he isn't Jesus in cleats this fan base will tear him and Kyle apart.

You're correct. That was my point earlier. The trade to #3 and the presence of guys like Fields and Lance who have elite level potential would make the pick of Jones over those guys be incredibly dangerous for the front office.

I think if you take a poll of all 49er fans you'll get a resounding positive response on their feelings towards Shanahan.

Take Jones at 3....that responsive takes a huge hit imo. So the window for Kyle to have success and not minor with Jones drops considerably.

it doesn't mean Jones is doomed to failure in making that pick/trade seem worthwhile but it would be a very puzzling move that has to prove dividends almost instantly.

it's a move which certainly doesn't make sense in the context of them wanting to keep Jimmy to start this year(which of course could be BS)

100% agreed.
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Jcool:
FWIW his ceiling is not Tom Brady.

My floor for him has been a good Kirk Cousins and my ceiling was an almost the best of Matt Ryan.

So his floor and ceiling are the same? Not sure ive seen that before.

If you call it that. then yes.
Originally posted by Jcool:
I wasn't sure but then you bolded them and it all clicked for me.

Originally posted by leonbanton:
I wasn't aware that Cousins or Jimmy had won. Neither has quarterbacked their team to a championship despite being on very good teams and an offensive guru. That has been the ceiling. A decent season with an offensive genius and ultimately loosing to a better quarterback.

Same with Matt Ryan. So I'm tired of everyone being enamored with these comparisons.

Yet there are Josh Allen, Steve McNair comparisons the other way. Also when they are compared to someone who does win.... it ain't worth it.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by NCommand:
It could be a monster success too. You look at all of the most successful QB's over the past 30 years and skill sets are all OVER the place from top physical traits to embarrassing physical traits to quick processors to slower processors to average skills across the board (master of none) to top in-your-face to quiet leadership skills, etc.

If there was one formula, we wouldn't be having this discussion. And to think YOU know now as a fan when professionals have come nowhere close to being good at these evaluations, is a bit much.

30 years ago Lamar Jackson is playing WR not winning an MVP as a QB. Times change. You either get on board or get left behind.

LOL. You never heard of Michael Vick or Randall Cunningham?

Randall Cunningham was deemed not good enough to play in the NFL out of college just because he is black.
Dude had to go to Canada to even get a sniff.

We can still see the bias in the scrutiny of Fields vs Jones.
One thing that is known is that Kyle has his dad watch film too. And Mike loves his big strong athletic guys like young, Elway, and cutler. You have to think that Mike is influencing him into getting lance or fields.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by GangstaGangsta:
The age old question "can people change?" will finally be answered come draft day lol

Gotta learn from his mistakes. Who are arguably top 3 QBs in league? Mahomes, Allen, and Watson? All mobile QBs able to create outside the pocket. You'd figure after losing to Mahomes in SB and watching Allen completely annihilate the 49ers with ease he would be second guessing his QB theory. If Mac is the super computer everyone says he is then we should expect Peyton type ceiling. As much as they gave up for him, that's a reasonable expectation IMO. I'd be OK with Rivers/Ryan type ceiling, I'm think somwhere between Couch and Cousins.

I beg to differ sir. All three of these guys are great because their ARMS are ridiculous. The movement helps them to put pressure on the defense, but without those ridiculous arms, they'd be mediocre. That's why I'm leaning back towards Fields over Lance. It's not that Lance doesn't have a good arm, but when I watch him what I see is slow. Deliberate. When I watch Fields what I see is lightning off platform rockets.

Funny because slow and deliberate is how many draftnicks see Fields. Lace was very aggressive and he didn't turn the ball over. He simply doesn't take the kind of sacks that Fields does sitting back there not finding the open man as his pass protection doesn't hold up for 3 sec or more.

I've just not seen Lance have to move quickly, or to quickly throw to a hot. It could just be that he's a greedy QB who can't resist the deep ball.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
There are literally HUNDREDS of guys who never got much better at these things. Thousands probably. We have three on our team the last few years. We also had several others: Kaepernick, Gabbert, Barkley, Hoyer, Shaun, Troy Smith, David Carr, and on and on. The only one of our QBs the last 15 years that actually got appreciably better at the mental side of the game is Smith -- and he was TERRIBLE at it before then, so it's not like he became elite.

And there's SO MUCH context to every single case...you're throwing it all into one bag, which is silly.

IF you don't have the right coaching staff or roster you're f**ked. IF you're lazy and can't put the time in your f**ked. IF you get thrown out there too quickly and it's overwhelming/you're not prepared...you're f**ked.

I can point out HUNDREDS of guys coming out of college that were regarded as smart and could read coverages that failed all the same.

It is a learned trait, you're not born with the god given ability to read coverages lol. YOU LEARN THAT. Thinking a guy is a finished product regarding X's and O's At 20-22 is absurd.

That's because it's not about being smart or reading coverages. It's about visual instinct.

Mahomes per his own admission couldn't really read coverages coming out, but he still had this trait I'm talking about.

Yeah, I think there's a disconnect about what you believe I'm talking about and what I'm actually talking about. I'll try to clarify.
.
.
.

You know how Russell Wilson has a magical "feel" for when someone is about to grab him? That's not learned. It's inherent instinct. Something similar applies to when I say "vision" and "processing speed." I probably need to change my terms, because it seems they have variable meaning.

I am referring to a guy who has a visual instinct, where he can -- subconsciously -- take in a bunch of spatial information, his brain (behind the scenes) calculating trajectories and motions.

Now, it is true that sometimes this can be learned to an extent. For example, it's not impossible for you to learn how to juggle (which is something similar). But certain guys have a tremendous natural advantage at that, and I believe when a guy struggles at it, it will often times show up in him, for example, failing to see wide open hot routes on a regular basis.

Anyway, I think that's a good analogy of what I'm trying to say here. Think about juggling. That frame of mind. You can't just look at one ball. If you do, you'll drop them all. If you've ever juggled before, you know exactly the state of mind that takes. It is NOT about intelligence at all. It's related to spatial awareness. This isn't the same thing as what I'm talking about with quarterbacks, but it's similar. It's a similar state of mind, and a similar subconscious awareness. I don't know what the technical term is for that in football circles, but I do know that it comes easy for some guys and very hard for others.

That said, we don't know if Lance is failing to see open guys because he lacks that, or if it's just because he loves the long ball too much. A lot of the times when he doesn't see that route, he's taking a shot. So he might just need to be reigned in, like Brett Favre was. I'd say that's less likely the case with Fields because it appears sometimes he just doesn't realize a blitz is coming (which I might add I was skeptical of until I was convinced by gifs and links from guys here on this forum, before some ignorant mor0n calls me a racist again).
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Apr 2, 2021 at 8:43 AM ]
Share 49ersWebzone