There are 633 users in the forums

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Shop 49ers game tickets

Mac Jones-QB-Jaguars

Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by adrianlesnar:
I still don't understand why Jones is the only "on script" QB and Fields is an "off script" QB.

Still don't understand how we went from Jones will only reach his ceiling in a Shannahan offense to Shannahans offence will only reach it's ceiling with Jones.

I just want Dan Marino. Is that too much to ask?

Nope. His release is still quick, arm strength not what is was, still a pure pocket passer, not in very good shape....hey just like Mac.

I can see the entire webzobe implode if Mac is the choice. Its going to be an insane day for sure.

Yeah, there's going to be an uproar if Mac is the pick. It's going to be crazy.

Can't wait.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by cortana49:
I completely agree. There's some real hate going on that is completely unnecessary.

The hate is more based on the fact that he's actually being pushed as a legit option...it's not his fault the media has run with this.

you listen to any reasonable draft evaluator talk about this and that's what they say...it's not about hating on Mac and more that he's simply not on the same level as the other 4 QBs in this draft.

I'm not talking about evaluators explaining Mac's football acumen etc. I'm talking about some of the posters here attacking him in a personal way. Completely unnecessary.
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by adrianlesnar:
I still don't understand why Jones is the only "on script" QB and Fields is an "off script" QB.

Still don't understand how we went from Jones will only reach his ceiling in a Shannahan offense to Shannahans offence will only reach it's ceiling with Jones.

I just want Dan Marino. Is that too much to ask?

Nope. His release is still quick, arm strength not what is was, still a pure pocket passer, not in very good shape....hey just like Mac.

I can see the entire webzobe implode if Mac is the choice. Its going to be an insane day for sure.

Yeah, there's going to be an uproar if Mac is the pick. It's going to be crazy.

Can't wait.

Not just Webzone, basically the majority of the entire fan base worldwide.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by cortana49:
I completely agree. There's some real hate going on that is completely unnecessary.

The hate is more based on the fact that he's actually being pushed as a legit option...it's not his fault the media has run with this.

you listen to any reasonable draft evaluator talk about this and that's what they say...it's not about hating on Mac and more that he's simply not on the same level as the other 4 QBs in this draft.

So we have to trash him, because the media says we might pick him?

I'll argue to the cows come home that Fields is a much better prospect, but we don't have to bash the guy. He can play, and he'd be really good for us.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Below average arm? Dafuq.

He goes into detail about it. Many of his deeper throws the receivers had to wait on the ball to get there. He showed the same thing in his pro day he does on film. His arm talent is at best average.

His arm isnt strong enough to throw off platform either. Many of them fluttered when he couldn't set his feet.

There are plenty of examples on film.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
The Eagles were trying to trade up to #3. Only when the 49ers traded up did they trade down.

Only if they were assured of Wilson. That's why they backed off. They heard Wilson wouldn't be there.
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by cortana49:
I completely agree. There's some real hate going on that is completely unnecessary.

The hate is more based on the fact that he's actually being pushed as a legit option...it's not his fault the media has run with this.

you listen to any reasonable draft evaluator talk about this and that's what they say...it's not about hating on Mac and more that he's simply not on the same level as the other 4 QBs in this draft.

So we have to trash him, because the media says we might pick him?

I'll argue to the cows come home that Fields is a much better prospect, but we don't have to bash the guy. He can play, and he'd be really good for us.

Based on what? History says he probably wouldn't be that good.
Originally posted by cortana49:
I'm not talking about evaluators explaining Mac's football acumen etc. I'm talking about some of the posters here attacking him in a personal way. Completely unnecessary.

Lol seriously? Who cares...
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Nope. 272, 218, 308 yds rushing. 200-300 yds is hardly an immobile pocket guy.Think Brady-esque, less than 120 ydsseason. 8yds per game roughly.

LOL. That's nothing.

Zactly, Brady is the definitive pocket passer. Mahomes 300% more rushing yards

Too funny.

Pocket passers = < 150 (Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger, Rodgers, Ryan, Brady, Goff, Mayfield, Herbert, etc.)
Pocket passers with mobility = < 300 (Mahomes, Tannehill)
Athletic QB's = > 300 (Wilson, Allen, Jackson, Watson)

Still a massive minority for playoff teams.

Do you have a preference?

Geez if u r gonna quote stats at least get em right: Herbert 234yds 5td in 15 games. 234>150. You're the only one who thinks Mahomes is a pocket passer, good on you. Lol.

Rodgers age 36, 37 seasons were his only season he did not have 200 yds rushing g when he played a full 16 games.

Kyler Murray doesn't count I guess, 500+ and 800+.

So that leaves me Brees (retired), Brady great but almost retired, Ben (Whiny and almost retired,), Ryan (not quite as retired but close) , Mayfield (meh), and Goff (horrible)

I'll definitely take the third group every single day going foward.

No matter how you spin it, it goes against your original take.

I'll give you Herbert because of when he started but again, the mass majority are pocket first, run last with the mass majority under 300 yards for 16 games. Which is not significant at all.

Hell, even Joe Montana had a career rushing of 1,676 yards and 20 touchdowns. Too funny.

You all are acting like every athletic QB coming out is going to rush for 1,200 yards like Lamar Jackson and it's a major threat.

No matter, it's still "pocket first" no matter the style of QB and no matter the offense (unless you're Greg Roman).

Just going to have to agree to disagree, you have you view of pocket passer and I have mine.. They are way different.. But rewatch the last two SBs, tell me how often Mahomes is just sitting there in the pocket, never trying to move or create. Not a pocket QB.

Mac Jones 14 yds rushing last year. 110 seasons and he'd almost catch Montana.

It's all good.

I personally want that pocket-first QB too who badly wants to master that first and only use that mobility to extend plays behind the LOS safely and on designed runs on an overly aggressive defense (like when we punked Charles Haley with Steve Young or Alex Smith on the keeper against the Saints).

I want that Montana QB ability with Young escapability and speed.

That's that 2nd bucket for me (Mahomes). Balance!

No biggie. I just want it all.

With Kyle's system and genius where he's taken care of the ground game. The run offense. The pass offense is what he needs from a QB. I don't think his scheme incorporates much off schedule throws like a scramble drill. His whole scheme is designed to stress defenses from the pocket so the QB doesn't need to scramble. Unless of course its a designed scramble. (The boot pass).

The philosophical question of intangibles vs athleticism is a good question. In kyles scheme I think intangibles matter more than athleticism- at least I think Kyles that's why Kyle chooses the QB he chooses. Greg Roman's offense is more of where an athletic QB matters. Then there are many variations in between.

You know that's fact because when it turned into a scramble drill OL and receivers don't know what to do here.
Agree, and probably because Jimmy isn't the kind of athletic QB that would make scramble drills worthwhile to practice.

If Fields/Lance is the pick, Kyle will have to incorporate more scramble drill type offensive plays to take advantage of the QB's athleticism. Maybe even something designed like the Play Action Boot Pass where if Fields/Lance has pretty much play-faked the entire 11 man defense, he has the greenlight from Kyle to run to the end zone (or something like that).
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
So we have to trash him, because the media says we might pick him?

I'll argue to the cows come home that Fields is a much better prospect, but we don't have to bash the guy. He can play, and he'd be really good for us.

He's not drastically better than what we already have and I'll debate that all day.

so people bash him because he's fat, eats cookies, has a avg arm ...guess what that's all true.

he can play on a all-star roster, same as Tua.
Originally posted by Ripamaru:
Only if they were assured of Wilson. That's why they backed off. They heard Wilson wouldn't be there.



Breer said this about Miami and SF

Teams calling the Dolphins to sniff around the third pick were told only that Miami had a strong offer for it. The Dolphins didn't shop the Niners' offer, and the Niners didn't double back to the Jets or anyone else looking for a better deal.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by krizay:
Mad respect!

Then let's keep Jimmy

Too expensive. Right?

Not if you want to play in the super bowl in 2021.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree, and probably because Jimmy isn't the kind of athletic QB that would make scramble drills worthwhile to practice.

If Fields/Lance is the pick, Kyle will have to incorporate more scramble drill type offensive plays to take advantage of the QB's athleticism. Maybe even something designed like the Play Action Boot Pass where if Fields/Lance has pretty much play-faked the entire 11 man defense, he has the greenlight from Kyle to run to the end zone (or something like that).

The entire offense goes to other level with those guys. The run game would be nuts.

our RZ issues greatly improve. You got a man down on defense that has to spy. You get to dictate coverages, especially on 3rd down (you're not replaying man).

I mean just look at what QBs give kyle the most issues...why in the world would he not want that?
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by krizay:
Mad respect!

Then let's keep Jimmy

Too expensive. Right?

Not if you want to play in the super bowl in 2021.

Right...Apparently not even if they're keeping him this yr lol.

go pay for Dalton if you want a system QB. Go draft Mills

[ Edited by NYniner85 on Apr 3, 2021 at 6:50 AM ]
I am might consider about Mac Jones because he is probably good for passer and good release for throw the balls to wrs and te.



Share 49ersWebzone