Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Originally posted by IceMan1763:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
The funny thing is that these qualities you talk about for Mac, he has over Lawrence and Wilson. Yet with them their unquestioned physical ability is taken into account and they're graded higher.
I do not understand how this isn't the case with Fields, who is as physically talented (well more) as those guys, and as accurate as Mac.
People talk about anticipation issues with Fields, yet Lawrence has the same concerns (both nonsense and due to the offense) and issues against the blitz (yet Zach Wilson is worse).
It's mind boggling.
I really don't think Wilson is as good of a prospect as the Jets apparently do, but because I'm assuming he'll be gone at 3 I haven't talked about him much. I would imagine it's the same for a lot of other people in this thread.
Lawrence I don't see as perfect but I do see him as a generational type of prospect who deserves to go #1 overal.
I dont disagree with him going number one, but outside of the hype and him looking the part what does he do that has cemented him number one?
Is he that much better than Fields and Wilson?
Lawrence mainly going #1 because he has been great since he was a freshman.
So has Fields..
Fields couldn't beat out J.Fromm.
FROMM was the coaches favorite... crap like that happens all the time..
I used to think that Cody Pickett would have been better than Alex Smith had NOLAN gave him more time to develop..
Ha right, everyone acts like they have the expertise to nitpick at their footwork, release, etc. We are all just keyboard scouts who know nothing!