Originally posted by boomer49er:
Originally posted by HawkBearPig:
Originally posted by boomer49er:
Originally posted by HawkBearPig:
Originally posted by hello49:
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree, and I'll just add, that I think, at least in Kyle's offense, a QB using his athleticism to buy time in the pocket is much more valuable than being able to run for yardage on the ground.
One way to use a QB's athleticism is the Roman Offense with Lamar Jackson. But the guys that are winning super bowls are the guys that stay in the pocket.
Thats the beauty of fields: he is a pocket passer who also has elite athleticism. Why would you settle for Mac??
yeah can you imagine what our offense would look like if Jones was back there instead of Fields or Lance, and Mcglinchy has some bad games again?
I don't think it would be as bad as you think, not if Mac is able to find the hot read / open receiver and get rid of the ball quickly.
Except that the number suggest he isn't especially good when having to come off his first read.
Jones strength was his pre-snap reads. However, when that read wasn't there things didn't always turn out as well.
I suggest watching the JTO QB school break downs of Mac Jones. Lots of cut-ups in there of Mac going through progressions post-snap and hitting his 4th or 5th read.
You should watch them I think.
This video is full of him not getting past his first read, missing throws, passing up on the best choice, inaccurate throws, late throws, etc.
He's not very good.
Lack of arm strength is concerning, reminds me of Ken Dorsey - not good.
[ Edited by mayo49 on Apr 12, 2021 at 1:16 AM ]