There are 228 users in the forums
Sam Darnold-Traded to Panthers
- thl408
- Moderator
- Posts: 33,072
- Phoenix49ers
- Moderator
- Posts: 123,062
Originally posted by thl408:
A 2nd rounder? ugh
A high 2nd would be pretty steep for a QB who might ultimately turn out to be a bust while also on the final year of their rookie contract. I don't for a second buy that the 49ers would trade that much just for him only to "push" Garoppolo.
- Bloodless
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,159
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Get ready kids
Peter King just said on PFT that a source close to the #49ers layed out a scenario where SF trades a 2nd to the #Jets for Sam Darnold to put pressure on Jimmy G. A Darnold trade wouldn't mean the end of Jimmy.
— Brian Peacock (@BDPeacock) March 12, 2021
That is just nonsense. I don't see how there is any possible way if we traded for Darnold we would be keeping Jimmy. Having that type of money tied up in those two players with the number of holes we currently have. If this happened someone needs to get fired.
- thl408
- Moderator
- Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by thl408:
A 2nd rounder? ugh
A high 2nd would be pretty steep for a QB who might ultimately turn out to be a bust while also on the final year of their rookie contract. I don't for a second buy that the 49ers would trade that much just for him only to "push" Garoppolo.
SF's 2021 2nd rounder is towards the top (#44).
Rosen to MIA went for the #62 pick + a 5th, but that was after 1 bad season in ARI. Darnold has 3 bad seasons on his resume so his value should not be as high as the #44 - not even close imo.
- thl408
- Moderator
- Posts: 33,072
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 111,048
- Heroism
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,869
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Get ready kids
Peter King just said on PFT that a source close to the #49ers layed out a scenario where SF trades a 2nd to the #Jets for Sam Darnold to put pressure on Jimmy G. A Darnold trade wouldn't mean the end of Jimmy.
— Brian Peacock (@BDPeacock) March 12, 2021
Lol
- cciowa
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,541
- Hysterikal
- Veteran
- Posts: 35,637
Originally posted by NYniner85:
FWIW king said the same thing about Denver giving up their 40th pick...literally the same thing. Dude is working for the Jets now I guess haha
Peter Kings boss is like we need more clickbait! Peters like I got you fam
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 62,098
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Get ready kids
Peter King just said on PFT that a source close to the #49ers layed out a scenario where SF trades a 2nd to the #Jets for Sam Darnold to put pressure on Jimmy G. A Darnold trade wouldn't mean the end of Jimmy.
— Brian Peacock (@BDPeacock) March 12, 2021
I don't buy it. First NE gets shutdown by Lynch and now they're gonna trade for Darnold?? And I also doubt they tie up that much money at the QB position.
- frenchmov
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,611
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,052
- okdkid
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,204
For that reason, I'm calling BS. It doesn't make sense. If they are going to trade a 2nd for a QB that may not be on the roster in 2022 OR will cost significant money moving forward.... why not just draft a QB in the 1st and let him sit behind Garoppolo? At the very least that QB would be under cost control for 5 years.
I think if you get Darnold, you do move on from Garoppolo. If you plan to keep Garoppolo...then you either sign a vet FA QB or take a QB early. But not a NON-CONTROLABLE QB.
2nd round picks are too valuable to blow on a "put pressure on our starter" guy that may never see the field for this franchise.
- Costanza
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,731
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Get ready kids
Peter King just said on PFT that a source close to the #49ers layed out a scenario where SF trades a 2nd to the #Jets for Sam Darnold to put pressure on Jimmy G. A Darnold trade wouldn't mean the end of Jimmy.
— Brian Peacock (@BDPeacock) March 12, 2021
LOL. Terrible if true.
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 62,098
Originally posted by okdkid:
If the Niners "need to put pressure" on Garoppolo by spending a 2nd round pick on a backup QB...he's not the guy.
For that reason, I'm calling BS. It doesn't make sense. If they are going to trade a 2nd for a QB that may not be on the roster in 2022 OR will cost significant money moving forward.... why not just draft a QB in the 1st and let him sit behind Garoppolo? At the very least that QB would be under cost control for 5 years.
I think if you get Darnold, you do move on from Garoppolo. If you plan to keep Garoppolo...then you either sign a vet FA QB or take a QB early. But not a NON-CONTROLABLE QB.
2nd round picks are too valuable to blow on a "put pressure on our starter" guy that may never see the field for this franchise.
This all day!!!