Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Agreed. Plus I'd rather trade up for Zach Wilson if they're trading for a QB.
You would rather trade up for an unproven prospect than trade for a 25 year old perennial Pro Bowler?
When the cost is probably 3 to 4 times a much? Hell yes. The cost to get Watson would torpedo this franchise for a decade.
The idea that it would take 3 or 4 TIMES as much to trade for Watson is absurd to me.
The STARTING price is three years of first and second rounders PLUS a high end roster player. f**k that, we might get one ring in before the mess catches up to us but our roster would be a dumpster fire for a decade after. His cap hit in two years if 40 million.....you wont even be able resign what we have much less cover the holes he creates in free agency. Compare that to one year of losing a few picks to secure a high end rookie talent and actually create 20 million in cap room? Yeah I am going with the rookie....Watson at the price that is being reported us f**king stupid.
Trading up for Wilson would likely cost 3 first round picks, if he in fact would be taken 2nd or 3rd like most mocks are saying. So 9 to 12 first round picks for Watson? Hook me up with what you are smoking on sir.
And his cap hit is completely irrelevant. Restructures are a thing.
you are delusional
If I was to post a poll somehow on this site that asked if it would take 9 to 12 first round picks for Watson or not, I would bet you that there isnt a single person on this board other than you that would vote yes.
You, sir, are the delusional one.
[ Edited by SteveWallacesHelmet on Jan 7, 2021 at 12:05 PM ]