Deshaun Watson

Originally posted by JTB1974:
Even if the Browns are still in contention when this suspensions wears off, How much is Watson really going to help them the rest of the way? He looked awful in that pre-season game and I doubt another 3 1/2 month layoff is going to help him get rid of the already rust he currently has.

Dude didn't play all of last season either

The Browns had to know that this year was probably a throw away year. Very risky contract. Kinda convenient his 1st game is against the Texans.

Originally posted by FL9er:
The Browns had to know that this year was probably a throw away year. Very risky contract. Kinda convenient his 1st game is against the Texans.

Rigged just like our super bowls

Originally posted by TyCore:
Jeez, guys.

Don't you think he feels bad enough as it?

Let's not kick a man while he's down.

Ty, this is the Watson thread.. the JG thread is over there.

I wonder if any opposing player is gonna talk s**t to him during games and refer to him as "happy ending".

His new name is captain Tug

Watson still a massive hypocrite POS

https://youtu.be/Su581Efse64

I encourage you to watch the manti teo documentary. Man that thing hurt my heart that such a terrible thing could happen to such a good kid. I'm posting this here because captain tug is such a POS. What a contrast

Originally posted by Jubwub88:

I encourage you to watch the manti teo documentary. Man that thing hurt my heart that such a terrible thing could happen to such a good kid. I'm posting this here because captain tug is such a POS. What a contrast

Can't believe anyone would want a movie made about how gullible he is. And the NFL doing favors for Watson is odd.

His apology didn't sound very sincere to me. He basically said what he had to and that's it.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
His apology didn't sound very sincere to me. He basically said what he had to and that's it.

It was a super weak, half-assed apology. He only apologized that the situation "triggered" people and maintained he did nothing wrong. Crazy how he refuses to accept any responsibility and 100% denies any wrong-doing.

Originally posted by diehardniners408:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

His apology didn't sound very sincere to me. He basically said what he had to and that's it.

It was a super weak, half-assed apology. He only apologized that the situation "triggered" people and maintained he did nothing wrong. Crazy how he refuses to accept any responsibility and 100% denies any wrong-doing.

Doesnt he still have civil cases against him? He cant exactly admit any wrong doing.

I heard on First Take that most or all of these women weren't certified MT's. If so, what exactly was Watson thinking? He should have known that they would go after his $ as they were already providing an illegal business service to make $.

I think he thought they wouldn't report him because they were $ hungry and needed to do whatever to make a dollar.

It's a cold world

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
His apology didn't sound very sincere to me. He basically said what he had to and that's it.

That's because he maintains his innocence. If I knew I was innocent of something I was accused of don't expect a "sincere" apology from me, if you get one at all.

Originally posted by FL9er:
The Browns had to know that this year was probably a throw away year. Very risky contract. Kinda convenient his 1st game is against the Texans.

Yeah, the Browns knew. It's why they structured the 1st year of his contract the wat they did. They suspected that he might be suspended the first year, so the first year of his contract is only $1 million, which really pissed the owners off.

But my question, again, to many calling Watson a "predator" is: if he is indeed a sexual predator, why did TWO grand juries decline to indict him? Grand juries are prosecutors' home turf. We've seen prosecutors use grand juries in some of the most despicable ways, for example, to obfuscate prosecuting obviously guilty law enforcement officers. ("Watch out Batman, it's a trap!"). Grand juries only see only what prosecutors want them to see. If it's true that "prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich", and with SO many women coming forward with allegations of sexual illegalities committed by Watson, how could a prosecutor NOT be able to convince TWO separate grand juries to return a bill of indictment against [trigger warning] a BLACK MAN accused of "me too", "cancel culture"-ready allegations where white women are involved? How could this be? Surely not ALL 20+ women are lying, right? We are living in a time where many men are serving long prison sentences on the sole word of a woman. After all, this is the "me too", "believe all women", "cancel" culture we're living in. What is it about this case, these allegations, that made it so difficult for Watson to not be held criminally accountable? Why didn't "me too", "believe all women", NOT work in court in this case? Why?!?!?