Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Ii Would be foolish to trade away our future franchise QB.
There are 144 users in the forums
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Imagine this team with slater and Samuel and two extra first rounders and a 3rd.
It's unbelievable.
Imagine this team next year when Jimmy's salary could in principle buy us two Pro-Bowl caliber cornerbacks, while the offense can attack more of the field and the running game is harder to defend.
And who would these pro bowl corners be? There aint a single pro bowl corner, who'll be on the right side of 31 available next off-season. You gonna give a multi-year, big guaranteed contract to Chris Harris or Joe Haden or Patrick Peterson? Gilmore will be 33 next season and Kyle Fuller 31 - if he even makes it to FA.
https://overthecap.com/free-agency/
Point is there will be 27 million dollars extra.
MANY of those players would greatly help this team, and surely some of them will be available.
I get the point. My point is, you really think we'd be better off with 33 year old corners over Jimmy G??? I'd rather they find a guy in the 2nd round, give Verrett another chance for cheap and look for another guy in the 4th or look for a cheap trade.
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
In a heartbeat
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Lance is untouchable - even if his stock maybe low.
How is his stock low, because he wasn't the starter? He came in for 4 plays and threw a TD pass on his only attempt. He got his feet wet in a live NFL game and put points on the board that helped the team secure the victory. Sounds like a pretty good outcome to me.
He has also shown he is not that great at converting 3rd downs and is injury prone already suffering a minor fracture. Trade him now and get a good corner back.
I guess the Chiefs should have traded Mahomes since he didn't beat out Alex Smith his first year. Same with Rogers at GB. Sometimes I have a hard time telling when a poster is serious.
Mahomes and Alex didn't have an open competition.
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
without hesitation
Originally posted by Goatie:
He has also shown he is not that great at converting 3rd downs and is injury prone already suffering a minor fracture. Trade him now and get a good corner back.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
In a heartbeat
And here we see the dangers of joining a cult.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Lance is untouchable - even if his stock maybe low.
How is his stock low, because he wasn't the starter? He came in for 4 plays and threw a TD pass on his only attempt. He got his feet wet in a live NFL game and put points on the board that helped the team secure the victory. Sounds like a pretty good outcome to me.
Because he didn't win the competition with Jimmy, some may see that as negative on his stock right now.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
In a heartbeat
And here we see the dangers of joining a cult.
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
In a heartbeat
And here we see the dangers of joining a cult.
Same guys who cried about Jimmy "hate" when people just didn't think that he's great. Now this is actual hate. Sad
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by mayo49:
I'm willing to give up substantial assets to get a legit corner.
Enough to trade Lance?
Lance is untouchable - even if his stock maybe low.
How is his stock low, because he wasn't the starter? He came in for 4 plays and threw a TD pass on his only attempt. He got his feet wet in a live NFL game and put points on the board that helped the team secure the victory. Sounds like a pretty good outcome to me.
Because he didn't win the competition with Jimmy, some may see that as negative on his stock right now.
Kyle basically said there wasn't an even competition and the snap counts with the first team offense prove that.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
Game 1: 4 snaps (1 throw, 3 runs)
Game 2: ?
my guess: 8 snaps (3 throws, 5 runs)
,
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Season is lost. Throw him in. Let him learn.