Dallas Cowboys QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by qnnhan7:
I think Lance should get ready to see some action in this game Young defense of the Jags ripe for over aggressive misdirection plays. Lance gonna be awesome.

As long as Kyle doesn't bootleg him 25 times.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
No because they've been successful. Theyve shown they can win with him. They went to the superbowl with him. That's not a waste of time.

I think if jimmy was always healthy we wouldn't have traded. It's not 100% a talent thing, I think jimmy is a pretty good QB but he's been way too injured and you can't depend on him staying healthy unfortunately

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
No because they've been successful. Theyve shown they can win with him. They went to the superbowl with him. That's not a waste of time.

I think if jimmy was always healthy we wouldn't have traded. It's not 100% a talent thing, I think jimmy is a pretty good QB but he's been way too injured and you can't depend on him staying healthy unfortunately

I think it's obvious that Jimmy would be the long term answer at QB for us, if not for all his injuries.

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college he was going to be elite.. this other guy played one year in college, and don't get me wrong I hope this guy proves out to be something.. I mean Lynch mortgaged the future of the team when he most likely he won't be here much longer.

I mean these comps to Watson and calling him a top 10 are a little premature and hilarious.. let's just see if he turns out to be mediocre and see how you all react.. kinda of funny how Jimmy has had a pretty decent year when he didn't have to give a f**k about this team; and is continued to be disrespected by these same fans

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Ok fine let's just see in two years the reactions and the excuses that are made like when they claim they are made for Jimmy

wonder if they are going to be real or like they were for Mullens

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Ok fine let's just see in two years the reactions and the excuses that are made like when they claim they are made for Jimmy

wonder if they are going to be real or like they were for Mullens

Mullens was ass.

Jimmy homers need to accept the fact that Kyle wanted to move on and learn to deal with it. Be a niner fan first. No player is bigger than the Niners.

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
No because they've been successful. Theyve shown they can win with him. They went to the superbowl with him. That's not a waste of time.

I think if jimmy was always healthy we wouldn't have traded. It's not 100% a talent thing, I think jimmy is a pretty good QB but he's been way too injured and you can't depend on him staying healthy unfortunately

That's totally fair. And I'm sure adding a skill set is exciting too.

Originally posted by qnnhan7:
I think Lance should get ready to see some action in this game Young defense of the Jags ripe for over aggressive misdirection plays. Lance gonna be awesome.

I may be wrong, and I OFTEN AM, but I think there are only two ways that super-rookie Trey Lance sees the field this weekend other than from the sideline.

1. Jimmy Garappolo gets hurt. Knowing Jimmy's injury history, this is entirely possible.
2. The 49ers score 42 unanswered points. At which point you get to see Trey during the 4th quarter. But he only gets to hand off to running back X.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Ok fine let's just see in two years the reactions and the excuses that are made like when they claim they are made for Jimmy

wonder if they are going to be real or like they were for Mullens

Mullens was ass.

Jimmy homers need to accept the fact that Kyle wanted to move on and learn to deal with it. Be a niner fan first. No player is bigger than the Niners.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Ok fine let's just see in two years the reactions and the excuses that are made like when they claim they are made for Jimmy

wonder if they are going to be real or like they were for Mullens

Mullens was ass.

Jimmy homers need to accept the fact that Kyle wanted to move on and learn to deal with it. Be a niner fan first. No player is bigger than the Niners.

Yeah, but i also remember how many thot, self included, we were fixed at QB with Mullie who had put in a couple relief appearances and did well. But as a starter, we got our balloon busted re: Mullie and by yrs end it was obvious our first pick in draft had to be a Qb. Whether we picked at the right slot or not , or whether who we picked is the right one,, we won't know for perhaps another season or so. For our sakes, i hope he IS the one, because we bet the farm on him.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by onetrackt:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
He got MORE accurate, son. His rookie completion percentage was 52.8. His second season was 58.8. His third season was 69.2. Is that easy enough for you to understand? I don't know how much more remedial I can make it.

EDIT -- for some reason I thought you were actually responding to me and not emphasizing my post. So this actually is directed to SD. LMAO.

I was like wut? Lol

Oh great, the two loudest anti-Jimmy, pro-Stafford posters are going after each other now.

We better win this weekend! LOL

That one dude is already ready to call him a top 10 qb in two years without even seeing him play two professional games.

and they wonder why

In two years? What's wrong with that? I was ready to call Bosa a top 10 DE in 2 years without ever seeing him play on the field as well.

He was a top pick and so that's what you'd like to forecast. So what?

Hmm let's see Nick Bosa proved in college....

No no . You said "without seeing him play professional games." That was your criteria.

Now you're backtracking and talking about college accomplishments that we can all view and judge differently.

If you are going to be critical of how others see things, stay with the line you 1st choose and commit to it. Own what you are saying.

There's zero wrong with projecting a Top 3 drafted QB to be a top 10 QB after a couple seasons starting.

Jacksonville and Jets fans have done the same. Doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Ok fine let's just see in two years the reactions and the excuses that are made like when they claim they are made for Jimmy

wonder if they are going to be real or like they were for Mullens

Mullens was ass.

Jimmy homers need to accept the fact that Kyle wanted to move on and learn to deal with it. Be a niner fan first. No player is bigger than the Niners.

First off your comment makes no sense, if Kyle wanted to move on your Trey Lance would have started from day one. Second, I am a niner fan first why do you think I'm rooting for Jimmy to do well; he is the starting qb.

I don't want to see Trey Lance fail when he becomes the starting qb, I hope he does great. I just think it's hilarious at all the disrespect Jimmy has gotten over the years. Fans and media always claiming someone is better, the poor guy just takes a beating and still goes out, competes, and has handled every situation professionally; you don't think he doesnt hear and see this stuff. Same way it was with Alex Smith but he got replaced with the "hot hand", that was a coach that wanted a qb gone.

Anyway, the media and fans acted like Mullens was the next great thing, hmm what team is he on now.. oh that's right..

so the future awaits, hopefully it turns out positive.

Originally posted by billbird2111:

Originally posted by qnnhan7:
I think Lance should get ready to see some action in this game Young defense of the Jags ripe for over aggressive misdirection plays. Lance gonna be awesome.

I may be wrong, and I OFTEN AM, but I think there are only two ways that super-rookie Trey Lance sees the field this weekend other than from the sideline.

1. Jimmy Garappolo gets hurt. Knowing Jimmy's injury history, this is entirely possible.
2. The 49ers score 42 unanswered points. At which point you get to see Trey during the 4th quarter. But he only gets to hand off to running back X.

Kyle sprinkled in Lance inside the red zone against the Lions, no reason he won't do that against the Jags. Don't think anyone talking about Lance starting over Jimmy against the Jags.

Originally posted by qnnhan7:

Originally posted by billbird2111:

Originally posted by qnnhan7:
I think Lance should get ready to see some action in this game Young defense of the Jags ripe for over aggressive misdirection plays. Lance gonna be awesome.

I may be wrong, and I OFTEN AM, but I think there are only two ways that super-rookie Trey Lance sees the field this weekend other than from the sideline.

1. Jimmy Garappolo gets hurt. Knowing Jimmy's injury history, this is entirely possible.
2. The 49ers score 42 unanswered points. At which point you get to see Trey during the 4th quarter. But he only gets to hand off to running back X.

Kyle sprinkled in Lance inside the red zone against the Lions, no reason he won't do that against the Jags. Don't think anyone talking about Lance starting over Jimmy against the Jags.

I think that he wants to, but is afraid, either of Trey getting injured, or of destabilising the momentum we have gathered or of bringing back the circus to start Trey.

Kyle has his reasons for rolling with Jimmy, and it's fine for us to disagree or debate those, but I really don't think Trey's performance has had much bearing on the situation.