Dallas Cowboys QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Babysitting is not an option when the window is now. Babysitting is done with bad teams that can afford rookie mistakes. It's not the other 52 guys fault he won't play football for 3 years. They are there to win too no babysit.

Well guess what they drafted a QB and tough tits that's how it goes….they've been babysitting Jimmy for 4 yrs all the same. It's not the 52 other guys fault when Jimmy throws INTs misses reads and can't stay on the damn field. Lance isn't replacing Brett Favre

Originally posted by JTB1974:
So let me get this straight. We go with Jimmy now with an elite roster but we still won't win the superbowl because we are lacking at the most important position. Then when Trey becomes elite we go with him when he has a horrible roster to work with and we still don't win the superbowl because of that.Is that what I am hearing?

Having a great roster to help a young rookie QB with elite traits win games is a bad thing I guess…you're suppose to be like the Jags and have a bunch of s**t around a rookie QB and force him to do more than he should be.

Not much to see but glad these two are working out together and building chemistry.

Originally posted by Dsoto87:

Not much to see but glad these two are working out together and building chemistry.

Agree. These 2 will make huge strides this year

Originally posted by tohara3:

Originally posted by Dsoto87:

Not much to see but glad these two are working out together and building chemistry.

Agree. These 2 will make huge strides this year

I think he'll be WR1 now that Lance Is the QB.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
whats wrong with saying hes not ready this year? He's not saying he's garbage. Just still climbing his way up this year. overreact much?

No rookie QB is "ready" it's a dumb thing to say….you're never ready to play until you actually get to play a decent amount of football. Same s**t with just about everything in life, especially sports.

it's like people can't handle drafting a QB and the ups and downs that come with it….suck it up buttercup that's the route they took and he's gotta play to get better, not sit the bench and NOT play football for what will be 3 yrs

Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe after sitting for 18 months behind deberg. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Peyton Manning 'shouldn'tve' played in 1998?

Originally posted by RickyRoma:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Peyton Manning 'shouldn'tve' played in 1998?

My point exactly. No.

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Babysitting is not an option when the window is now. Babysitting is done with bad teams that can afford rookie mistakes. It's not the other 52 guys fault he won't play football for 3 years. They are there to win too no babysit.

So let me get this straight. We go with Jimmy now with an elite roster but we still won't win the superbowl because we are lacking at the most important position. Then when Trey becomes elite we go with him when he has a horrible roster to work with and we still don't win the superbowl because of that.Is that what I am hearing?

Im talking about this upcoming season. Jimmy gives us the best chance to win. It's undeniable as he's gotten us to the NFCC every year he's been healthy. He he got us there with a broken hand and shoulder. The coaches and front offices job is to win. Jimmy has Super Bowl potential. He's been there and was one play away. That's simply not the case with Lance. That's not a knock on lance. He's young. He'll be fine but Jimmy is still here for a reason.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Babysitting is not an option when the window is now. Babysitting is done with bad teams that can afford rookie mistakes. It's not the other 52 guys fault he won't play football for 3 years. They are there to win too no babysit.

So let me get this straight. We go with Jimmy now with an elite roster but we still won't win the superbowl because we are lacking at the most important position. Then when Trey becomes elite we go with him when he has a horrible roster to work with and we still don't win the superbowl because of that.Is that what I am hearing?

Im talking about this upcoming season. Jimmy gives us the best chance to win. It's undeniable as he's gotten us to the NFCC every year he's been healthy. He he got us there with a broken hand and shoulder. The coaches and front offices job is to win. Jimmy has Super Bowl potential. He's been there and was one play away. That's simply not the case with Lance. That's not a knock on lance. He's young. He'll be fine but Jimmy is still here for a reason.

Why is this controversial. Plain as day. Only in the alice in wonderland webzone.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Im talking about this upcoming season. Jimmy gives us the best chance to win. It's undeniable as he's gotten us to the NFCC every year he's been healthy. He he got us there with a broken hand and shoulder. The coaches and front offices job is to win. Jimmy has Super Bowl potential. He's been there and was one play away. That's simply not the case with Lance. That's not a knock on lance. He's young. He'll be fine but Jimmy is still here for a reason.

He didn't get them to the NFCC this year the defense and special teams did. He didn't get them to the NFCC in 2019 either Mostert and his 220 yards did. Idk why y'all Jimmy homers act blind to how he plays.

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by RickyRoma:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Peyton Manning 'shouldn'tve' played in 1998?

My point exactly. No.

Ben Roethlisberger went 15-1 in his rookie year and won an SB in his 2nd year.

Before his arrival, the Steelers were perennial contenders with excellent defenses, run games, and skill players who couldn't get over the hump because of mediocre QB play. Sounds familiar.

Trey was drafted to get the Niners over the hump, if he isn't ready then it's not go back to Jimmy, it's ship both QBs out & bring in Brady to finally get ring #6.

But that isn't the case, Trey is prepared to start and run Shanahan's offense.

Here's a comparison of Jimmy's 3rd year stats that made him a hot commodity vs. Lance's rookie year.

Jimmy Year 3:

43-63 68.3% for 504 yards and 4 tds and no int. 113.3 QB rating.

2-0* against 7-8-1 Cardinals and 10-6 Dolphins

*injured shoulder in 3rd quarter of Dolphins game and missed the next 2 games of Brady's suspension.

Lance Year 1:

41-71 57.7% 604 yards 5 tds 2 ints 2 running tds 97.3 QB rating

2.5 games against 7-10 Seahawks, 11-6 Cardinals, and 4-13 Texans. 1-1 starter record.

Claiming Lance isn't ready and that rookies shouldn't play, goes against evidence to the contrary.

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by RackofRibs49:
Babysitting is not an option when the window is now. Babysitting is done with bad teams that can afford rookie mistakes. It's not the other 52 guys fault he won't play football for 3 years. They are there to win too no babysit.

So let me get this straight. We go with Jimmy now with an elite roster but we still won't win the superbowl because we are lacking at the most important position. Then when Trey becomes elite we go with him when he has a horrible roster to work with and we still don't win the superbowl because of that.Is that what I am hearing?

Im talking about this upcoming season. Jimmy gives us the best chance to win. It's undeniable as he's gotten us to the NFCC every year he's been healthy. He he got us there with a broken hand and shoulder. The coaches and front offices job is to win. Jimmy has Super Bowl potential. He's been there and was one play away. That's simply not the case with Lance. That's not a knock on lance. He's young. He'll be fine but Jimmy is still here for a reason.

Jimmy isn't an SB winning QB, if he were, then he'd hit a wide open Emmanuel Sanders for the TD; he'd hit Kittle on the seam route for either a td or a big gain during the NFCCG.

He's a mediocre talent on par with Jake Delhommes, Trent Green, Alex Smith. Solid starting QBs but not SB winners.

Despite what Lynch says, they need his salary off the books.

Originally posted by SinceXVI:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by RickyRoma:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Peyton Manning 'shouldn'tve' played in 1998?

My point exactly. No.

Ben Roethlisberger went 15-1 in his rookie year and won an SB in his 2nd year.

Before his arrival, the Steelers were perennial contenders with excellent defenses, run games, and skill players who couldn't get over the hump because of mediocre QB play. Sounds familiar.

Trey was drafted to get the Niners over the hump, if he isn't ready then it's not go back to Jimmy, it's ship both QBs out & bring in Brady to finally get ring #6.

But that isn't the case, Trey is prepared to start and run Shanahan's offense.

Here's a comparison of Jimmy's 3rd year stats that made him a hot commodity vs. Lance's rookie year.

Jimmy Year 3:

43-63 68.3% for 504 yards and 4 tds and no int. 113.3 QB rating.

2-0* against 7-8-1 Cardinals and 10-6 Dolphins

*injured shoulder in 3rd quarter of Dolphins game and missed the next 2 games of Brady's suspension.

Lance Year 1:

41-71 57.7% 604 yards 5 tds 2 ints 2 running tds 97.3 QB rating

2.5 games against 7-10 Seahawks, 11-6 Cardinals, and 4-13 Texans. 1-1 starter record.

Claiming Lance isn't ready and that rookies shouldn't play, goes against evidence to the contrary.

If you say boss

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by SinceXVI:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by RickyRoma:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Right. That's why no rookie should play. It worked out for joe. He won a super bowl in year three with ricky patton earl cooper lenvil elliot and charlie young carrying the load.of course joe worked for true pass game genius who invemted the foundations of modern possession passing. So there's that.

Peyton Manning 'shouldn'tve' played in 1998?

My point exactly. No.

Ben Roethlisberger went 15-1 in his rookie year and won an SB in his 2nd year.

Before his arrival, the Steelers were perennial contenders with excellent defenses, run games, and skill players who couldn't get over the hump because of mediocre QB play. Sounds familiar.

Trey was drafted to get the Niners over the hump, if he isn't ready then it's not go back to Jimmy, it's ship both QBs out & bring in Brady to finally get ring #6.

But that isn't the case, Trey is prepared to start and run Shanahan's offense.

Here's a comparison of Jimmy's 3rd year stats that made him a hot commodity vs. Lance's rookie year.

Jimmy Year 3:

43-63 68.3% for 504 yards and 4 tds and no int. 113.3 QB rating.

2-0* against 7-8-1 Cardinals and 10-6 Dolphins

*injured shoulder in 3rd quarter of Dolphins game and missed the next 2 games of Brady's suspension.

Lance Year 1:

41-71 57.7% 604 yards 5 tds 2 ints 2 running tds 97.3 QB rating

2.5 games against 7-10 Seahawks, 11-6 Cardinals, and 4-13 Texans. 1-1 starter record.

Claiming Lance isn't ready and that rookies shouldn't play, goes against evidence to the contrary.

If you say boss

Whatever, don't make weak arguments that can easily be shot down.