Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by tommyncal:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by tommyncal:
I think it's more than the media. GMs believe you do need a FQB , otherwise, they wouldn't be trading quality assets for them. Dump Goff bring in Stafford, dump Mayfield bring in Watson . I guess we'll wait and see how many SBs the Pats win with Mac.
Yes the same Stafford that threw a punt to Tartt that could've sealed their fate.
Also, I believe Goff too went to a SB with LAR with a lesser team.
Last time we saw Watson in the playoffs he and HOU blew a bigger lead to KC than Jimmy G and the 9ers.
Stop cherry picking certain plays. You're telling me you'd rather have a Goff, Garoppolo, Cousins etc than Mahomes, Brady or another elite QB to try and reach the SB ?
Mahomes or Brady, no doubt, not sure if there are any other elites right now.
Hopefully Lance joins the list of elites.
Dude you just gonna ignore the MVP based on one game in which it was frozen? Rodgers is elite af. Fan bias makes some of us think one game determines the rule (and the truth is, Rodgers was the best QB on the field that game). I don't get it. The same arguments were made after week 10. Suddenly Stafford is garbage because Jimmy had a career game and Stafford had his worst game of the year. One game is not a large enough sample size to determine if a guy is good or bad in a season.
Also, I think most of us can agree that Josh Allen has taken that step into the elite category. And Wilson, sorry to say it, but he was having a typical top 8 season, as he always does. Herbert, if he's not there yet, is probably going to be soon.
.
.
If you, again, organize these guys by most statistical metrics, you'll see three clear and distinguished tiers. Now, maybe you don't want to call all the tier one guys elite, and that's reasonable, since the slope for the top ten guys is pretty steep, but there's a huge drop off after them.
And I hate to be the bearer of even more pessimism, but the odds of Lance hitting that threshold are surely no better than 50/50.
Dude has one ring. He isn't elite.
This might be it. The most ridiculous thing ever said on this board. Aaron Rodgers is not an elite QB, per woo.
Steve Young only won one ring as a starter too. I guess he wasn't elite... (do we have a facepalm gif? Let me use this one instead:
)
I can have as man6 tiers as I want, there is no more merit in three tiers than four or five.
Incorrect, because in several different statistical rankings, the QBs most often fall into three major clusters of production.
Trey has the ceiling of an elite player.
Not sure why you want to.be pessimistic about Trey and so defensive of Rodgers here.
This is a time of great hope, the team is so strong.
I think Trey does have the ceiling of an elite player. I'm pessimistic about reaching THAT height because very few players, very few
talented players even, ever reach that height. I'll be happy with someone better than Jimmy.
As for "being defensive" about Rodgers, it has nothing to do with Rodgers. I'm defensive about observable reality.