Dallas Cowboys QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
I get your point and agree stat wise that Trey doesn't need to light it up but if Trey is Jalen Hurts then that's pretty underwhelming imo. I'm personally not sold on the guy one bit. He has a good start but averaged under 180 yards per his last 8. The team was winning so I'll take that over stats but I hope Trey is better.

If he's Hurts in his first season that's more than fine with this team. He's not gonna be a Jedi master as a in the pocket passer yr 1, no one should be expecting that.

philly ran the s**t out of the football second half of the year. I expect the same from SF. I think Lance is by far more talented then Hurts, I just don't think he's gonna come out like Mahomes right off the bat.

baby steps people

No argument on that, I just think Hurts is setting the bar too low but I do agree that expectations need to be tempered.

Originally posted by NinerPrideinNJ:
This guy was third overall and cost 2 additional first rounders.

The benchmark is not Jalen Hurts, and if it is...that's a huge problem.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
All this trashing of Hurts.. meanwhile Michael Irvin a Cowboy.. is talking about a Philly dynasty as is TO..

Not sure what ya'll are looking at

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
All this trashing of Hurts.. meanwhile Michael Irvin a Cowboy.. is talking about a Philly dynasty as is TO..

Not sure what ya'll are looking at

Well their roster, like our's is pretty stacked.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
All this trashing of Hurts.. meanwhile Michael Irvin a Cowboy.. is talking about a Philly dynasty as is TO..

Not sure what ya'll are looking at

Well their roster, like our's is pretty stacked.

Yeah I mean he played very well last year and they added AJ Brown.. I don't get why ppl keep using him as the barometer of suck.. I'm impressed he led them to the playoffs without Brown..

Originally posted by JTB1974:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
So by those numbers, Offensive Linemen and Defensive Linemen have the third and fourth longest careers, but they take on far more contact in a game than WRs do and yet WRs have the second shortest careers. Is it possible that there are more factors involved than just more contact = shorter career?

Common sense indeed.

Also can't compare RB's to even the most running QB's in the league. RB's are getting 20+ carries a game on most days and are also getting hit, bumped, tackled, and piled on by multiple guys. Majority of the time the QB is getting brought down by 1 guy. Lamar runs a ton but you rarely see him taking a big hit. RB's can't really avoid that kind of physical contact. Aslong as Trey is smart about it and doesn't try to constantly run over people and also knows when to just slide or run out of bounds he should be ok.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by TownNiner:
Head coach wants the team to win, shock.

Even if it means putting his QB in harm's way.

Football's football. Harm will be in your way regardless.

I'll tell u right now,...he's still going to scramble and run the ball from time to time.

Originally posted by NinerPrideinNJ:
This guy was third overall and cost 2 additional first rounders.

The benchmark is not Jalen Hurts, and if it is...that's a huge problem.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
No ar

No argument on that, I just think Hurts is setting the bar too low but I do agree that expectations need to be tempered.

I think the bar is appropriate for his first yr…great D and a offense based around the run. Same as Philly.

Lance is more talented and I don't expect him to just be Hurts for his career or anything. We're talking YR1.

4,000 total yards, 61 comp%, 30+ total TDs I wouldn't be upset with that at all…great base to develop off of.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
No ar

No argument on that, I just think Hurts is setting the bar too low but I do agree that expectations need to be tempered.

I think the bar is appropriate for his first yr…great D and a offense based around the run. Same as Philly.

Lance is more talented and I don't expect him to just be Hurts for his career or anything. We're talking YR1.

4,000 total yards, 61 comp%, 30+ total TDs I wouldn't be upset with that at all…great base to develop off of.

The #3 pick who we traded three 1st for having a similar season to the 53rd pick is "appropriate?" Lol wow. Y'all really lining up the excuses.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
No ar

No argument on that, I just think Hurts is setting the bar too low but I do agree that expectations need to be tempered.

I think the bar is appropriate for his first yr…great D and a offense based around the run. Same as Philly.

Lance is more talented and I don't expect him to just be Hurts for his career or anything. We're talking YR1.

4,000 total yards, 61 comp%, 30+ total TDs I wouldn't be upset with that at all…great base to develop off of.

The #3 pick who we traded three 1st for having a similar season to the 53rd pick is "appropriate?" Lol wow. Y'all really lining up the excuses.

Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Are you guys saying we should expect just as much out of a 3rd rounder as a 3rd total pick? One that we spent 3 first rounders on?! Expectations should be exactly the same?

Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Are you guys saying we should expect just as much out of a 3rd rounder as a 3rd total pick? One that we spent 3 first rounders on?! Expectations should be exactly the same?