Dallas Cowboys QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
I never said anything like "Teams have performed well solely because of QBs" you are making up an argument to argue against again.

I never mentioned Jimmy, it is weird that you always bring him up out od nowhere in random theeads.

And ypu also brought up defending Stafforf.

Hey...sorry if you think I strayed from the topic. Apologies.

I edited the needless stuff out so we can stay on topic as you wanted.

I will simply wait and see your rationale for saying both of these things within a couple days:

I said that team success will be something Lance is judged on due to this year's success and recent success. Do you disagree, if so, why? You haven't offered an opinion on what I posted.

I also said that Stafford was lucky Tartt dropped that ball. Do you disagree with that, if so, why?

Again deleting the personal stuff because u dont like or want to discuss that stuff here, remember?

You said Lance's success will be judged by how well the team does. Which makes no sense but if we accept that, then why are you not applying the same to the last SB winner?

Is it the same? Your judgement of him was that HE WAS LUCKY AND HE SUCKS. And I'm not digging something old up, as this was posted here by you in the same thread just a day or 2 ago. The hope is that you understand the confusion you may cause when you contradict your stance in this way.

You made a rule that you clearly don't believe in,....otherwise, you wouldn'tve said both things about different QBs within days of each other.

Soooo...which is it? Because it can't be both.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
If TL puts in the work he can do whatever he wants to do, the ability is there. Last year Hurts said year 3 starts tomorrow the day they lost to Tampa in playoffs. In other words, he was talking about putting in the work. Lance mentioned taking a few weeks off, around this same time period, and I noticed the contrast. You will see Hurts on Sunday in the Super Bowl.

As long as Lance doesn't ghost the team all offseason i'm good with a break.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
If TL puts in the work he can do whatever he wants to do, the ability is there. Last year Hurts said year 3 starts tomorrow the day they lost to Tampa in playoffs. In other words, he was talking about putting in the work. Lance mentioned taking a few weeks off, around this same time period, and I noticed the contrast. You will see Hurts on Sunday in the Super Bowl.

As long as Lance doesn't ghost the team all offseason i'm good with a break.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
He's had two years worth of breaks. A lot of down time. It's go time.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
He's had two years worth of breaks. A lot of down time. It's go time.

It's go time when hes cleared.

Originally posted by Koldo:
Denial is strong with Treystans.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Trey_ning wheels is not going to be our starting QB. The best you can hope for is a poor mans Taysom Hill who is less athletic.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Koldo:
Denial is strong with Treystans.

Trey_ning wheels is not going to be our starting QB. The best you can hope for is a poor mans Taysom Hill who is less athletic.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

I never said anything like "Teams have performed well solely because of QBs" you are making up an argument to argue against again.

I never mentioned Jimmy, it is weird that you always bring him up out od nowhere in random theeads.

And ypu also brought up defending Stafforf.

Hey...sorry if you think I strayed from the topic. Apologies.

I edited the needless stuff out so we can stay on topic as you wanted.

I will simply wait and see your rationale for saying both of these things within a couple days:

I said that team success will be something Lance is judged on due to this year's success and recent success. Do you disagree, if so, why? You haven't offered an opinion on what I posted.

I also said that Stafford was lucky Tartt dropped that ball. Do you disagree with that, if so, why?

Again deleting the personal stuff because u dont like or want to discuss that stuff here, remember?

You said Lance's success will be judged by how well the team does. Which makes no sense but if we accept that, then why are you not applying the same to the last SB winner?

Is it the same? Your judgement of him was that HE WAS LUCKY AND HE SUCKS. And I'm not digging something old up, as this was posted here by you in the same thread just a day or 2 ago. The hope is that you understand the confusion you may cause when you contradict your stance in this way.

You made a rule that you clearly don't believe in,....otherwise, you wouldn'tve said both things about different QBs within days of each other.

Soooo...which is it? Because it can't be both.

Originally posted by glorydayz:
If Trey does suck, who should get fired?

three 1st round picks should = somebody's termination.

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Woo gonna Woo

Originally posted by glorydayz:
If Trey does suck, who should get fired?

three 1st round picks should = somebody's termination.