Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by thl408:
Well, that was fun and short lived taking about scheme and how Trey fits, or doesn't fit. Back to the usual I guess.
I mean personally, I don't think it's about "scheme fit" if you're a good QB you're a good QB. Do we think Kyle wouldn't take guys like Mahomes/Allen/hurts/Watson/Jackson etc and ball out? A good offensive mind molds his offense to his personnel…If we think kyle wouldn't get the most out of those guys then that's an issue.
I think kyle's first real opportunity to get the QB he wanted (which was Lance) shows he's multiple from a scheme standpoint. For most of his time in the NFL he was never really the final decision maker on what QB he wanted. Jimmy just fell into their lap and they tossed a buttload of cash at him after 5 games. Turned out to not be the best move.
I do think kyle has a problem with patience and QB development. It's why he wanted Kirk, he knew the scheme and had the years of reps in the NFL. It wasn't because that's his "ideal QB" it was just familiar. He even said Kirk wasn't his ideal QB.
Yes, if a QB is good, he's good. Rookie Trey Lance was clearly lacking in some areas (game experience, spotty accuracy in the short range imo), but Kyle selected him anyway, knowing that the 2021/22/23/24 team was in a position to win, not rebuild. I think that despite Lance lacking in some areas, Kyle knew he could think up a gameplan that would work as he balanced winning games with getting Lance experience on the fly.
Your point about patience is a good one. I think all coaches would rather have a ready-to-go QB instead of hoping that one will develop. After all, a head coach is worried about so many other things than the footwork/release point of his QB. But Kyle then showed patience with his selection of Lance.