Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Fair enough regarding the ad hominem. I won't do it anymore. But, I maintain that defenders taking false steps or waiting until after the mesh action to react is not a matter of opinion.
You are correct though.
There are 201 users in the forums
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Fair enough regarding the ad hominem. I won't do it anymore. But, I maintain that defenders taking false steps or waiting until after the mesh action to react is not a matter of opinion.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Regarding the Seahawks, the 49ers ran the ball 45 times for 189 yards. EXCLUDING Deebo's 51 yard run, the 49ers had 57 rushing yards on 11 carries with Lance under center, for an average of 5.2 yards per carry. The rest of the game they had 81 yards on 33 carries for an average of 2.5. right there in the same game you see the difference with Lance, and I've EXCLUDED that 51 yard run in which two linebackers clearly respected Lance's ability to run behind the pulling linemen.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Regarding the Seahawks, the 49ers ran the ball 45 times for 189 yards. EXCLUDING Deebo's 51 yard run, the 49ers had 57 rushing yards on 11 carries with Lance under center, for an average of 5.2 yards per carry. The rest of the game they had 81 yards on 33 carries for an average of 2.5. right there in the same game you see the difference with Lance, and I've EXCLUDED that 51 yard run in which two linebackers clearly respected Lance's ability to run behind the pulling linemen.
I'm not arguing that Lance doesn't boost our run game. He does. He's a good runner at the QB position. I'm arguing Deebo's running* isn't the product of Trey Lance and to argue or imply that it* is is ridiculous.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Well yeah. Trey's only impact on that play was being partially responsible for the initial motion of the interior linebackers. Deebo was dead to rights on that play but beat the end in a one v one situatoin. Also, I imagine it can be argued that maybe Trey read that wrong and should have kept it, because the end clearly had the edge and was waiting for Deebo. But despite what Charlie is saying, Trey played a role in those two interior linebackers respecting the pulling action.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
He had other games last season that were in line with what he averaged with Trey in his 5 quarters at QB. And his best season running was with Jimmy G at QB.
Also not playing the Bears and Seahawks defense every week probably doesn't help.
Originally posted by eric_anthony:
Yeah it was his best season because it was fresh and DC's weren't expecting it. I'm just saying Deebo as rb would've worked better this past year if Trey played cause the defenses would lock in on Trey keeping the ball.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Fair enough regarding the ad hominem. I won't do it anymore. But, I maintain that defenders taking false steps or waiting until after the mesh action to react is not a matter of opinion.
You are correct though.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:Fair enough regarding the ad hominem. I won't do it anymore. But, I maintain that defenders taking false steps or waiting until after the mesh action to react is not a matter of opinion.
You are correct though.
Absolutely correct.
Rings is obliterating Charlie in this argument, if you can even call it that.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:Originally posted by CharlieSheen:Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:And the second play look at 58. Clearly watching the mesh point to react to where the run actually goes, instead of attacking the logical place the run would go if not for the threat of the QB run.
I mean, are you kidding me? 0/2 on this video. Come on man.
Lol he plays the play just like anyone would. You are trying too hard to say it's because of Trey. Those are all Deebo. It's like taking one play where Trey went deep and Jimmy went short and saying he reads the field better than Jimmy lol. You jump to some crazy conclusions
I use that one play because it's the most convenient one. You can tell Trey is not predetermining where he's throwing all the time because he's a tick late sometimes as he surveys and then reacts. You can tell Jimmy is predetermining because he'll look right in the direction of a wide open guy and throw to someone else, like he did twice in the red zone in the Super Bowl (which cost us 8 points). Jimmy is looking off the defense there, executing a series of steps he planned before the ball was snapped. Trey is a watch and reactor. He's not sticking to his predetermined plan. He's watching and trying to react. That gets him in trouble because he isn't experienced enough to anticipate where things are going to go, making him a tick late sometimes.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Everyone that doesn't want Trey traded for a ham sandwich is a Trey homer.
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Fair enough regarding the ad hominem. I won't do it anymore. But, I maintain that defenders taking false steps or waiting until after the mesh action to react is not a matter of opinion.
You are correct though.
Absolutely correct.
Rings is obliterating Charlie in this argument, if you can even call it that.
Any Trey homer will think that Truth is I proved it with film that Deebo was breaking off huge runs and Trey had nothing to do with it. Watch the Deebo highlights up until Trey gets injured. All long runs from Deebo that had nothing to do with Trey
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:I'm not a Trey homer. I've been arguing with NY about Brock today too.
Deebo is a great player. He makes his own yards. The most important part of that play was obviously Deebo breaking the tackle attempt by the edge player. But there's no reasonable doubt that Trey doesn't cause middle linebackers to freeze during that mesh action, and there's no doubt on that particular run it helped a little bit by screwing up their angle of pursuit. Nevertheless, it's one run, and you seemed to ignore all the other facts about that game, such as the fact that even discounting that 51 yard run, the 49ers had about twice as many yards per carry with Trey than with Jimmy. In the same game.
And honestly, it boggles the mind why anyone would doubt that having a QB who can get yards on an inverted veer would affect how the defense plays the run. It's so obviously true it's spawned a cliche: "zone-read makes the defense play 11 on 11."