Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by 49erKing:
Did he legitimately beat out Brock for QB1 last year during TC? If so, that is saying something right, considering Brock went bonkers in the reg season and playoffs.
In an interview with Tim Kawakami Kyle fairly strongly intimated that Purdy had outplayed Lance in practice last year but because they had invested so much in Lance draft wise and hadn't actually seen Purdy do what he was doing in practice in a game, and because they knew Lance needed the reps, they committed to him as the starter that year. In a "fair" competition he wouldn't have beaten put Jimmy, he wouldn't have beaten out Purdy, and he might not even have beaten out Sudfield. No rap against Lance. He didn't force the team to draft him where they did, and he came in with less experience at the position than ANY QB who has ever been drafted so high in the modern era.
Not sure what the next step will be. If I'm not mistaken Darnold and Allen are only here on one-year contracts, while Lance still has two years left on his deal. Assuming Brock stays healthy and continues on his trajectory from last year they are still going to need QB's next season. With as little as they are paying Brock, they could afford to carry Lance for another year if Darnold decides to go looking for another starting gig. Be interesting to see what happens.
If Trey is a disappointment the way Brock was a success, then it's a wash and move forward. They have moved forward by getting Sam and Allen - and still keeping Trey and continuing to invest Reps into him. So I don't see ShanaLynch having given up on Trey. In addition, as you said, they *can carry* Lance if h
e's worth carrying because of Brock's minimal salary. From what I've seen, he's worth it (for now) I want to see him to continue to improve in the Denver game. I think they should keep Trey (if he continues to improve) since he does have a 2+ year contract and Sam and Allen are on one year prove it contracts.