Originally posted by OhioNiner:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
I find it so weird that Trey Lance is the only QB in NFL history who the media and a big chunk of our fan base believes should be born capable of playing NFL QB and not require any time to learn how to play the position first, how to read defenses, etc. It's just so odd. Lawrence, Fields, Wilson, Jones, all were given the benefit of the doubt while they were sucking as they learned how to do it in the NFL, and ALL of them had significantly more experience in college than Trey. And of course, Brock had four years as a starter in college, and Darnold had 55 games in the NFL.
Am I wrong on this? Is it not a little peculiar that in the case of Lance, it is assumed that if he is not immediately good without any reps or time to learn then he will be eternally bad? How does this make any sense? One of you Trey critics please explain this to me—and when you do please notice that in a single off-season he completely overhauled his mechanics and now is a pretty accurate passer. So that development never happened? Why is it that he's doomed to suck before he even gets a chance to learn? Why is he the only one with that designation?
I'd say yes you're wrong to a degree in which anytime you take such a huge sweeping statement as "the only QB in NFL history".
Off hand, I would say that the QB who was dubbed by Sports Illustrated as "Robo QB", whose father raised him to be the perfect quarterback, Todd Marinovich, would have fit into that QB. And obviously he was a massive bust.
And even quarterbacks who were considered generational if not for their arm talent, but for the talent they did have combined with their aptitude, Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck, and indeed whose fathers were former NFL QBs (and even teammates oddly at one point) would have faced similar expectations.
I think with Trey it's a combination of two or three things with both the media and the fan base. First, the media coverage and number of voices is larger than ever. In Marinovich's day, it was Sports Illustrated and ESPN, mostly. Other outlets as well but mostly. Now, Sports Illustrated is of course a different entity in this day and age but all defunct print media has been supplanted by the entire internet, which is, um, louder.
Combine that with the media's apparent desire to be hypercritical of the 49ers. Combine that with the fact that our "genius" head coach traded up to hand pick this wunderkid and there was always going to be a microscope. And even with that, we all are in our own fishbowl as Zach Wilson has liked had it tougher than Trey in that New York market.
Unfortunately for Trey it's a league and a world of what have you done for me lately and Trey hasn't been on the field to do much of anything. All of those QBs you mentioned given the benefit of the doubt, they also managed to stay on the field and play and learn through their mistakes. Well, in the case of Lawrence, Fields, and Jones anyway. Trey gets hurt, Brock Purdy comes out of nowhere to be the great "Rudy" story only one who's actually good, and Trey gets Wally Pipped and has to be not just adequate but amazing to any credit.
It's not fair of course. But I highly doubt if it's the first time in history even if each individual case has some uniqueness. Personally, I haven't been as much of a Trey critic as someone who felt like people were jumping the gun wanting to dump an admittedly limited, sometimes frustrating, but very competent QB in Jimmy for a guy who played relatively little at a FCS school. The unfortunate thing for him is he's seemingly stuck at this point barring injury as being the guy looked at as Kyle's handpicked future franchise QB who is just a backup at best barring another injury to Brock or his play regressing big time. And as a 3rd overall pick in the draft, traded up for, at that position, yeah unless and until that changes he's always going to have it tough. Fair or not.
I'd say I'm right, because it's not fair or reasonable to judge his entire career when he's not had two games in a row. It's reasonable to say he's injury prone and that kind of shot his opportunity with the 49ers, since he's missed an entire season and several games his rookie year (he's been hurt more than he's been available). But beyond that, I don't think it's reasonable.