Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by thl408:
In the posts you are making about how the team handled Lance, to me, it seems like you are leaving one very important aspect out - Brock playing well. How, if at all, do you think Brock factors into the team mismanaging Lance? To me, Lance got injured and Brock took his job. If your argument is that this is a mismanagement of Lance, then Kyle sitting Brock to develop Lance would be mismanaging the team.
I'm not saying the situation was handled great, since i never thought we should of drafted lance in the first place, but what are they supposed to do now? sit brock and try to develop lance?
People have to realize that the team most likely doesn't think Lance is going to become some stud, like certain people on here believe. Other teams don't believe that either since his trade value is essentially nothing. What he has shown in games, regardless if some want to believe it, isn't good. His value wouldn't tank worse than what Darnold's did when he was a Jet.
You can't just sit here and assume lance IS going to develop into a stud with more reps, if the team believed that, he would be #2, at worst.
Huh? QB2 gets the same reps as QB3, doesn't he?
traditionally, no. They may with Kyle but usually second string runs the scout team. a lot of teams don't even keep a third stringer anymore. but my point is that if they thought Lance had the ability to be great and just needed reps, they would get him on the field if the first string guy went down. Not take him farther away from it.
