There are 218 users in the forums
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
It's literally 50/50 you could argue either way which type of QB is injured more than the other. But if you wanna talk what type of QB has more Super Bowl rings, most definitely the pocket passer!!!
That too will change over the next 20 years too.
God, can you imagine what football will be like in 20 years? LOL
Originally posted by NCommand:
From your first reference:
In other words, one cannot predict from observed data that a signal-caller like 2019 MVP Lamar Jackson is more prone to injuries simply because he runs more than other NFL passers.
Sure you can. He's literally injured every year.
Originally posted by Polkadots:
Originally posted by NCommand:
From your first reference:
In other words, one cannot predict from observed data that a signal-caller like 2019 MVP Lamar Jackson is more prone to injuries simply because he runs more than other NFL passers.
Sure you can. He's literally injured every year.
What you quoted says data does not support the conclusion a running QB is more prone to injuries than a non-running QB. What you quoted does not say a running QB does not get hurt.
You concluded causation when what you used as evidence for said conclusion states there is no causal link. QBs get injured. And Lamar Jackson, being both a running QB, and oft injured QB, does not prove causation. Causation must be determined, not assumed.
#49ers GM John Lynch on Trey Lance's NFL debut⤵️
— Sterling Bennett (@49ers_Access) August 17, 2021
"He obviously made some plays. He showed his arm talent & did all those things well. I think [Shanahan] mentioned it...A lot of the strides he's made in terms of fundamentals that we've asked him to work on, he reverted a little."
Originally posted by Goatie:
Originally posted by Polkadots:
Originally posted by NCommand:
From your first reference:
In other words, one cannot predict from observed data that a signal-caller like 2019 MVP Lamar Jackson is more prone to injuries simply because he runs more than other NFL passers.
Sure you can. He's literally injured every year.
What you quoted says data does not support the conclusion a running QB is more prone to injuries than a non-running QB. What you quoted does not say a running QB does not get hurt.
You concluded causation when what you used as evidence for said conclusion states there is no causal link. QBs get injured. And Lamar Jackson, being both a running QB, and oft injured QB, does not prove causation. Causation must be determined, not assumed.
Your wrong. NC is right
Originally posted by Polkadots:
Originally posted by NCommand:
From your first reference:
In other words, one cannot predict from observed data that a signal-caller like 2019 MVP Lamar Jackson is more prone to injuries simply because he runs more than other NFL passers.
Sure you can. He's literally injured every year.
What you quoted says data does not support the conclusion a running QB is more prone to injuries than a non-running QB. What you quoted does not say a running QB does not get hurt.
You concluded causation when what you used as evidence for said conclusion states there is no causal link. QBs get injured. And Lamar Jackson, being both a running QB, and oft injured QB, does not prove causation. Causation must be determined, not assumed.
Originally posted by Crown:
"JG is never a threat"
his starting record enters the chat
Originally posted by fan49:Without jimmy, we wouldn't have made it that far
Originally posted by Crown:
"JG is never a threat"
his starting record enters the chat
What does he do that scares defenses? Don't say win because He went to the Super Bowl he did not take us. The running game and defense did that. So again what does jimmy do talent wise that defenses are afraid of?
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Because our not so young, less talented, more experienced QB makes these mistakes too.
This, absolutely this.
People forget also forget that our run game is our foundation.
Wait until Trey is adding to it, and then dropping bombs when the D creeps up.
This is the way.
It seems that many are ignoring that the kid should of had three picks in that game. It's as if those throws didn't even happen. He's not ready yet. This is a super bowl caliber roster. The coaches aren't going to sacrifice this roster just to get the rook more playing time. He can learn plenty during the season as QB2. When the coaches say he's ready, he'll start. JG is looking plenty sharp. If our o-line comes together, this may be a super year. Go Niners!
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
The other possibility is that you reinforce those tendencies to get sloppy if you throw him out there before he's ready, especially if he starts taking regular beatings and stops looking down the field.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Without jimmy, we wouldn't have made it that far
Originally posted by NCommand:
2.7s is plenty of time in Kyle's 2.5s offense.
Rookie QB avg time to throw
— George Chahrouri (@PFF_George) August 16, 2021
1. Wilson 2.4s (0 sk)
-
2. Jones 2.6s (1 sk)
3. Lawrence 2.7s (2 sk)
4. Lance 2.7s (4 sk)
-
-
5. Fields 3.8s (0 sk)
49ers 40.1 pass blk grade (🤮)
Bears 73.4. Fields was nice avoiding sacks but had help
Originally posted by pdc20:
Just start Garoppolo. He will win you games this season with a healthy team. And he might even lead the team to the Superbowl. This way you don´t risk to burn Trey Lance in his rookie season. You keep an ace in your sleeve if you need a change of pace during the season.
And like I said after the Chiefs game, if Lance has to only play behind the second team o-line, just don´t play him at all. It´s stupid to risk an injury on a meaningless preseason game. You want to play Trey and see his level? Play him with the first team.