RB Trey Sermon

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:
Still ragging on Sermon?

As Kruger mentioned Sermon is a back that needs to be feed to produce as he did in college, at least 15-20+ runs.

David Lombardi still has him penciled on his 53, and Hasty on the bubble and Mason to the PS. Lombardi's take is much more consistent than hacks like cohn and Chapman etc who's high on Hasty who has already proven unproductive vs NFL starters in the past 2 seasons and have dropped passes as a 3rd down back and is near useless as a runner.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by lamontb:
dude doesn't have much trade value

How about CHI? Maybe Justin Fields will vouch for him (college teammates). Agree, he doesn't have much value, if any.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49oz2superbowl:
I'd love to see a Trey Sermon for Amari Rodgers trade. Both were drafted rd 3 last year and been extremely disappointing. I truly think both would be better fits in the other's scheme. Sermon simply is not a fit for the zone scheme and Rodgers is about WR5/6 on the depth chart after they added Doubs / Watson.

Rodgers will be our depth for Deebo's role which we don't have anyone else on the roster who can provide that, even to a lesser degree.

Amari Rodgers that plays for GB? How is that a different scheme for him?

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by lamontb:
dude doesn't have much trade value

How about CHI? Maybe Justin Fields will vouch for him (college teammates). Agree, he doesn't have much value, if any.

THL, you are walking face first into a buzzsaw. A week 1 matchup vs an angry Trey Sermon. No, thank you.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by lamontb:
dude doesn't have much trade value

How about CHI? Maybe Justin Fields will vouch for him (college teammates). Agree, he doesn't have much value, if any.

THL, you are walking face first into a buzzsaw. A week 1 matchup vs an angry Trey Sermon. No, thank you.

Yeah I would hate for Sermon to give away all of our secrets to a vastly inferior opponent.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by 49oz2superbowl:
I'd love to see a Trey Sermon for Amari Rodgers trade. Both were drafted rd 3 last year and been extremely disappointing. I truly think both would be better fits in the other's scheme. Sermon simply is not a fit for the zone scheme and Rodgers is about WR5/6 on the depth chart after they added Doubs / Watson.

Rodgers will be our depth for Deebo's role which we don't have anyone else on the roster who can provide that, even to a lesser degree.

Amari Rodgers that plays for GB? How is that a different scheme for him?

This reminds me of the old Jon Baldwin trade you guys are taking me back

I mean GB pretty much runs our offense and they have a HOF level QB. If Rodgers isn't producing there it's definitely not an issue of needing a different scheme.

If we're trading Sermon it should either be for a future pick or see if we can bring in an OLman worth making our roster but if Sermon doesn't make the 53 here it means we have someone who should make it instead of him. Can't give away that spot to someone who hasn't been in this building.

Originally posted by 49oz2superbowl:
Only reason I think it makes sense is we got no clear WR6 but also no clear RB2-6. Packers got no clear RB3 but got like 5 WR's slated ahead of Rodgers. Basically swapping two 3rd rd disappointments in hopes that a change of scenery changes things. He looked pretty explosive against us in preseason.

Originally posted by Sickaa:
This Is why I'm against us drafting RB's with those early round picks. Stick to those late round/undrafted guys and develop them In to studs. No need to waste picks on drafting overrated Rbs.

Originally posted by Garce:
he gone

Originally posted by Sickaa:
This Is why I'm against us drafting RB's with those early round picks. Stick to those late round/undrafted guys and develop them In to studs. No need to waste picks on drafting overrated Rbs.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by lamontb:
dude doesn't have much trade value

How about CHI? Maybe Justin Fields will vouch for him (college teammates). Agree, he doesn't have much value, if any.

THL, you are walking face first into a buzzsaw. A week 1 matchup vs an angry Trey Sermon. No, thank you.

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Garce:
he gone

you have inside source?