Black Friday Sale: Up to 65% off at the 49ers online store →

There are 283 users in the forums

Safety Tony Jefferson

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Brunskill is a RFA, they'll tender him at least original round, and have right to match the offer, he'd likely sign a deal for 1 or 2 years like Moseley, Wilson, Harris, and Dwelley did.

Givens is a ERFA, so he's not going anywhere.

Verrett will be priority #1 to re-sign, then I think K'Waun, and Jones.

I think Wilson could be back, it depends on if JaMycal Hasty is able to pass waivers to the PS, and doesn't sign elsewhere.

If I had to pick 5 pending FAs that I think are most likely to return are, UFAs only, in no order.

RB Jeff Wilson Jr.
TE Ross Dwelley
NT D.J. Jones
CB Jason Verrett
CB K'Waun Williams

I also can see the team keeping Key, Hurst, Kerr on cheap 1yr deals if they show something, if not, they're not brought back, same with Gallman, Sherfield, James, Harris.

Moore may have to sign a 1yr prove it deal if he even recovers, now I think Ward sticks in 2022 or we draft a top tier FS.

Players(UFAs) likely gone.

RB Raheem Mostert
LG Laken Tomlinson
SS Jaquiski Tartt

I see no reason to resign Wilson...they have two other RBs and can find someone else.

I see no reason to resign Jones or Dwelley either unless its for pocket change. They're fine depth but shouldn't be top priorities. IMO they're replaceable.

If JV throws another yr out there like last yr then ya give him some cash...I don't think you can overpay him based on his age though. Something like Janoris Jenkins got 2 yrs $15M.

K'Waun is more than likely gone unless it's for a cheaper contract. They will have one the rookies as the nickel IMO.

Tartt will more than likely be gone and replaced via the draft or FA. Mostert I hope they bring back, can't be for more than what he's getting paid though. I also would be in favor of resigning Tomlinson hopefully and extension before the yrs starts.
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Jun 8, 2021 at 12:52 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Brunskill is a RFA, they'll tender him at least original round, and have right to match the offer, he'd likely sign a deal for 1 or 2 years like Moseley, Wilson, Harris, and Dwelley did.

Givens is a ERFA, so he's not going anywhere.

Verrett will be priority #1 to re-sign, then I think K'Waun, and Jones.

I think Wilson could be back, it depends on if JaMycal Hasty is able to pass waivers to the PS, and doesn't sign elsewhere.

If I had to pick 5 pending FAs that I think are most likely to return are, UFAs only, in no order.

RB Jeff Wilson Jr.
TE Ross Dwelley
NT D.J. Jones
CB Jason Verrett
CB K'Waun Williams

I also can see the team keeping Key, Hurst, Kerr on cheap 1yr deals if they show something, if not, they're not brought back, same with Gallman, Sherfield, James, Harris.

Moore may have to sign a 1yr prove it deal if he even recovers, now I think Ward sticks in 2022 or we draft a top tier FS.

Players(UFAs) likely gone.

RB Raheem Mostert
LG Laken Tomlinson
SS Jaquiski Tartt

I see no reason to resign Wilson...they have two other RBs and can find someone else.

I see no reason to resign Jones or Dwelley either unless its for pocket change. They're fine depth but shouldn't be top priorities. IMO they're replaceable.

If JV throws another yr out there like last yr then ya give him some cash...I don't think you can overpay him based on his age though. Something like Janoris Jenkins got 2 yrs $15M.

K'Waun is more than likely gone unless it's for a cheaper contract. They will have on the rookies as the nickel IMO.

Tartt will more than likely be gone and replaced via the draft or FA. Mostert I hope they bring back, can't be for more than what he's getting paid though. I also would be in favor of resigning Tomlinson hopefully and extension before the yrs starts.

Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by elguapo:
There you go again throwing out that same story that we know less or don't understand about what they're asked to do when that is not necessarily the case. Not even close. I watched both safeties film and they have not been that impressive. Not top 10 in my opinion and guess what??? Part of a safety's job is making game changing plays like PBU's or getting turnovers. You obviously have a low standard on safeties (and it seems are quick to make excuses and defend their very unremarkable play) much like some have a lower standard for quarterbacks saying exactly what you say about our safeties. I don't make excuses for Jimmy G or talk about his "role" in our offense to cover up for the plays that were there to make. Believe me, just as you say Jimmy G failed to see this, make a throw, avoid a sack and so on the same EXACT instances happen to both our starting safeties.

Try not to get it twisted and be consistent. They are not damn good safeties. You keep saying they do what they're asked to do? Does that mean not making many good plays at all? Getting to the ball too late? I guess that's what our coach tells them, don't ever make a play and especially don't get an int. You can argue all you want about stat chasing but you have to admit any safety thats told to "do their job" should get more PBU's, make more good plays, cover better and get more than two interceptions in seven years. That's a fact

The same reasons you rip Jimmy Garoppolo are the same reasons you should rip these two safeties. All three players I just mentioned are injury prone (Jimmy G Ward and Tartt) and they are not top 10 at their position. Try to make a better argument than that. You just really can't admit that we do not have very good safeties? You sure as hell admit it when it comes to Jimmy G. Come on. I know you never change your mind and get into it with a lot of other fans that disagree with you but my points are very reasonable. Are they not? Just like your points on Jimmy G. He is a solid qb but we need to upgrade. Same goes for both safeties.

Please show me all this film you have and are watching of them not doing what they're asked to do in this scheme?

What does Jimmy have to do with our safeties? Literally just moving goalposts on a completely different subject for no good reason. Jimmy IS limited at what he can do and we see that from the play calls week to week. It's the opposite of what Saleh asked of our safeties....ALSO please show me were I said they're top 10? I most certainly didn't. I'll I've said is this fan base for the most part doesn't appreciate what these guys bring to the table...a bunch of fans are stat evaluators and we see that when debating how amazing Jimmy was in 2019.

I've gotten pissed with them more in part because they can't stay on the field vs their actual play. We see what happens when we lose one or both of them. Sherm talks about how important both guys are to this defense, guess he's in idiot too?

SF has two safeties that are athletic enough to play man coverage vs WR/TE/RBs all game, either can play deep single-high, you can throw them in the slot, or as dime/box safeties....they're so multiple, how is that a bad thing? They allow this defense to be creative in blitz packages and are one of the main reasons we kick ass at stopping defenses on the deep ball. They take great angles, are sound tacklers and can blitz well.

Neither are year in and year our pro-bowlers and they don't get to roam around and take the ball away all game like some safeties (not playing that robber roll where you can break on passes to get INTs) so they won't get the love (clearly based on your opinion) BUT are good at what WE need them to do. I'll bet money guys like THL & Jonny who watch the film will agree, they're far from bad safeties like you keep saying.

You seem to speak in hyperbole and make assumptions? Well, if Sherman said that they are important to our defense then they must be very good safeties....OK. You have said at times "very good" safeties and I quote. Good safeties don't simply just do their job and not make plays. Above average ones do. If you do not want to watch the film or are in denial about how they do miss quite a few opportunities, that's your problem. Then, please show me the film where they aren't missing all of these plays that they could be making. And since you have trouble understanding the double standards involved in some of your posts or at least you don't hold players to an equal standard than thats not my problem. I know I'm not the first to say this. That is exactly why I brought Jimmy G up because it shows the contradiction that you make and you confuse that with accusing me of moving the goalposts? I think you're confused it was an example of how you don't hold a player like Jimmy to the same standard as the safeties. You want Jimmy out and think he's not a good qb (more above average according to you) but defend our safeties and they are injury prone too. Shocking!

Having solid players is nice and all but most teams strive to get the most out of their players and we definitely have a lot of room to improve with our starting safeties. This is what you keep denying and making excuses for their lack of plays being made as well as their injury history which is vast. I just thought you would want better safeties on the 49ers which most fans want. We do need an upgrade at those safety positions whether you want to admit it or not. Just like we needed an upgrade on a quarterback even though many see him as a better player than you do. Sounds kind of funny when you look at it that way doesn't it?

Also, stop saying I only care about interceptions because I've stated this many times that I don't. I want more plays on the ball, ints, game changing plays or stops. You don't have to make that up. Richard Sherman didn't always have a lot of interceptions or pass break ups neither did Nnamdi A and they were a great players. We are not talking about players like that or Jamal Adams from the Seahawks. We are talking about tartt and ward. Haha. So don't even try that.

Anyways, I'll just leave it at that. I just really thought you would agree that it is sensible and necessary to want to upgrade the safety positions. Guess I was wrong
[ Edited by elguapo on Jun 8, 2021 at 4:19 PM ]
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I didn't say either guy was better, I'm saying you're fooling yourself if you think the above mentioned couldn't perform the same or better.

I get it, they play a ton of man coverage but you're telling me that excuse is why they can't just get one INT to help the offense get back on the field, ONE!!!! I'm mostly talking about Ward since he's been the healthiest.

Sure 2019 was a dominant defense (again because of Bosa, Warner and Buckner), but don't tell me they couldn't have used a few takeaways that season by their Safeties.

Can I ask you something, was the 2019 and 2020 defense similar or the same to Seattle's legion of boom??

Exactly. It is what it is but at least you and I know as well as our coaching staff (if just to get less injury prone safeties) that the upgrades are needed. I don't know many that would go to these lengths to defend the safeties we have, especially one that got two interceptions in seven years. That is inexcusable. Players accidentally make more plays than that and that's not including his injury history. I'm not just talking about stats. There are many great players that don't get many interceptions or PBU's because they are never thrown to. Like Nmandi A on the raiders and some seasons Sherman.

let's just hope Ward and Tartt stay healthy and we eventually upgrade at the position
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.

Mostert brings something to the table that isn't teachable…elite speed. End of the day I won't be shocked if they don't sign either.

DJ'a role can be replaced and someone like Kerr/Hurst/givens can do the same.

I like Williams but nickel DB is also replaceable. I think we have the replacement on the team.

Agree on Laken.
Originally posted by elguapo:
You seem to speak in hyperbole and make assumptions? Well, if Sherman said that they are important to our defense then they must be very good safeties....OK. You have said at times "very good" safeties and I quote. Good safeties don't simply just do their job and not make plays. Above average ones do. If you do not want to watch the film or are in denial about how they do miss quite a few opportunities, that's your problem. Then, please show me the film where they aren't missing all of these plays that they could be making. And since you have trouble understanding the double standards involved in some of your posts or at least you don't hold players to an equal standard than thats not my problem. I know I'm not the first to say this. That is exactly why I brought Jimmy G up because it shows the contradiction that you make and you confuse that with accusing me of moving the goalposts? I think you're confused it was an example of how you don't hold a player like Jimmy to the same standard as the safeties. You want Jimmy out and think he's not a good qb (more above average according to you) but defend our safeties and they are injury prone too. Shocking!

Having solid players is nice and all but most teams strive to get the most out of their players and we definitely have a lot of room to improve with our starting safeties. This is what you keep denying and making excuses for their lack of plays being made as well as their injury history which is vast. I just thought you would want better safeties on the 49ers which most fans want. We do need an upgrade at those safety positions whether you want to admit it or not. Just like we needed an upgrade on a quarterback even though many see him as a better player than you do. Sounds kind of funny when you look at it that way doesn't it?

Anyways, I'll just leave it at that. I just really thought you would agree that it is sensible and necessary to want to upgrade the safety positions. Guess I was wrong

Again you said there's all this film you've watched that show all these bad plays…please show me.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Build 2 rosters that can make it the the playoffs is the only way to build a 49er roster

"Now that sounds like a great idea!" - Mama Fratelli in the Goonies
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by NYniner85:
...........
From 2018 to 2019 we used more quarter/C4 coverage (up 20% and blitzed more).

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/nfl-defense-2019-quarters-cover-4-san-francisco-49ers

No defense in the league this season has used Cover 4 more than the San Francisco 49ers, who are tied with the Carolina Panthers for most pass snaps with the coverage. If teams want to see what the best-case scenario is while using Quarters, they should look no further than San Francisco.

The 49ers have allowed a league-low 54.6% completion rate with Cover 4 and have allowed just 5.31 yards per attempt. San Francisco's defense has also seen a boost in the pass rush with Quarters — a 13.8% sack rate and a 39.6% pressure rate, both above the already impressive overall numbers of a 11.6% sack rate and 30.4% pressure rate on all plays.

San Francisco isn't just passively playing back in zone coverage and often their use of Cover 4 is disguised as Cover 3 before the snap. That typically asks one of the defensive backs to aggressively drop back pre-snap and asks a lot of the secondary to communicate but with the likes of Richard Sherman, Ahkello Whitherspoon, Jaquiski Tartt, and Jimmie Ward in the backfield, that has not been an issue. As is the case with many schemes, having the players who can execute it at a high level can be just as, if not more, important. San Francisco certainly has that.

Last week, the 49ers used this against Kyler Murray and the Arizona Cardinals. San Francisco initially showed an 8-man box against Arizona's two-back backfield with a tight end in the wing, but before the snap, both Tartt, who was in the box, and Sherman to the offense's right bailed back. The coverage held the two deep routes in front of the defenders and with pressure, Murray was forced to leave the pocket and throw a contested short pass that was broken up.

Here is a clip of that play

One of the appeals of Quarters coverage is that it typically shuts down deep passes and keeps the ball in front of the deep defenders. That is arguably the biggest strength of the 49ers' version of the coverage this season. Just eight passes at least 20 yards in the air have been attempted against San Francisco when the Niners have been in Cover 4 this season and none of them have been completed. That's a boost for a defense that has relative struggled against the deep ball this season. Per Football Outsiders, the 49ers rank first in DVOA against short passes but just 14th against deep passes.

The pre-snap disguise also makes the opposing offense hesitate just for a moment to identify the coverage, which is more than long enough for San Francisco's pass rush to breakthrough. The pre-snap to post-snap shift was something that made the Patriots' use of Quarters so effective in the Super Bowl against the Rams.
We don't really play the same type of defense as the LOB who were straight up C3....I'm not very great with x's and o's and I'm sure THL will touch on everything at some point.

I am shocked that the 49ers played the most Quarters in 2019. I knew they played it more than they ever had under Saleh (compared to 2017/18), but most in the league? I trust Sharp's stats. Should have called Cover4 on 3rd & 15.

IMO the primary job for a safety, in a defense that is considered 'bend don't break' (Saleh's defense), is to prevent explosive plays. A 10 yard run can't become a 20 yard run. A 20 yard pass can't become a house call. That is the low bar and what should be expected out of a competent safety in a 'bend don't break' defense. Outside of their occasional man coverage assignments, Ward and Tartt have done well in this area (limiting explosives). INTs can't be forced or it compromises the ability to limit explosives.

A DC can trust a safety enough to give him the green light to take chances, but I think Saleh asked his safeties to stick to their assignment and that is one reason for the low INTs from Ward/Tartt. The other reason is they simply aren't ballhawk type safeties. Guys like Minkah Fitzpatrick and Honeybadger seem to have that knack - they are special that way, and their coaches will put them in the intermediate areas to find turnovers. With the secondary having many one year deals, there's a lot of uncertainty how that group will look in 2022. It's a chance to find some ballhawks if that's what the coaches decide to focus on.
Originally posted by thl408:
I am shocked that the 49ers played the most Quarters in 2019. I knew they played it more than they ever had under Saleh (compared to 2017/18), but most in the league? I trust Sharp's stats. Should have called Cover4 on 3rd & 15.

IMO the primary job for a safety, in a defense that is considered 'bend don't break' (Saleh's defense), is to prevent explosive plays. A 10 yard run can't become a 20 yard run. A 20 yard pass can't become a house call. That is the low bar and what should be expected out of a competent safety in a 'bend don't break' defense. Outside of their occasional man coverage assignments, Ward and Tartt have done well in this area (limiting explosives). INTs can't be forced or it compromises the ability to limit explosives.

A DC can trust a safety enough to give him the green light to take chances, but I think Saleh asked his safeties to stick to their assignment and that is one reason for the low INTs from Ward/Tartt. The other reason is they simply aren't ballhawk type safeties. Guys like Minkah Fitzpatrick and Honeybadger seem to have that knack - they are special that way, and their coaches will put them in the intermediate areas to find turnovers. With the secondary having many one year deals, there's a lot of uncertainty how that group will look in 2022. It's a chance to find some ballhawks if that's what the coaches decide to focus on.

Thank you for clearing this up…people act like those ballhawk types grow on trees, which simply isn't true. Like you said coaches also put them in a position to make those INTS.

for the most part both our safeties have done what the DC has asked them to do.

IMO I just think our FO and coaching staff would rather put resources elsewhere then spend up for that top end safety…overall the defense hasn't suffered.
Originally posted by thl408:
I am shocked that the 49ers played the most Quarters in 2019. I knew they played it more than they ever had under Saleh (compared to 2017/18), but most in the league? I trust Sharp's stats. Should have called Cover4 on 3rd & 15.

IMO the primary job for a safety, in a defense that is considered 'bend don't break' (Saleh's defense), is to prevent explosive plays. A 10 yard run can't become a 20 yard run. A 20 yard pass can't become a house call. That is the low bar and what should be expected out of a competent safety in a 'bend don't break' defense. Outside of their occasional man coverage assignments, Ward and Tartt have done well in this area (limiting explosives). INTs can't be forced or it compromises the ability to limit explosives.

A DC can trust a safety enough to give him the green light to take chances, but I think Saleh asked his safeties to stick to their assignment and that is one reason for the low INTs from Ward/Tartt. The other reason is they simply aren't ballhawk type safeties. Guys like Minkah Fitzpatrick and Honeybadger seem to have that knack - they are special that way, and their coaches will put them in the intermediate areas to find turnovers. With the secondary having many one year deals, there's a lot of uncertainty how that group will look in 2022. It's a chance to find some ballhawks if that's what the coaches decide to focus on.

So to summarize : Playmaking is dependent not only upon the players individual responsibilities within the scheme and each individual play call but also in how the player is coached to play his position.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by thl408:
I am shocked that the 49ers played the most Quarters in 2019. I knew they played it more than they ever had under Saleh (compared to 2017/18), but most in the league? I trust Sharp's stats. Should have called Cover4 on 3rd & 15.

IMO the primary job for a safety, in a defense that is considered 'bend don't break' (Saleh's defense), is to prevent explosive plays. A 10 yard run can't become a 20 yard run. A 20 yard pass can't become a house call. That is the low bar and what should be expected out of a competent safety in a 'bend don't break' defense. Outside of their occasional man coverage assignments, Ward and Tartt have done well in this area (limiting explosives). INTs can't be forced or it compromises the ability to limit explosives.

A DC can trust a safety enough to give him the green light to take chances, but I think Saleh asked his safeties to stick to their assignment and that is one reason for the low INTs from Ward/Tartt. The other reason is they simply aren't ballhawk type safeties. Guys like Minkah Fitzpatrick and Honeybadger seem to have that knack - they are special that way, and their coaches will put them in the intermediate areas to find turnovers. With the secondary having many one year deals, there's a lot of uncertainty how that group will look in 2022. It's a chance to find some ballhawks if that's what the coaches decide to focus on.

Thank you for clearing this up…people act like those ballhawk types grow on trees, which simply isn't true. Like you said coaches also put them in a position to make those INTS.

for the most part both our safeties have done what the DC has asked them to do.

IMO I just think our FO and coaching staff would rather put resources elsewhere then spend up for that top end safety…overall the defense hasn't suffered.

Yeah thank you for clearing this up as well. They are definitely not ball hawk type safeties in the least. Far from it. I wish they had better instincts that resulted in bigger impact plays not just interceptions. But, like you said, they are not ball hawk type safeties. Nobody expects a top safety on every team or a ball hawk, however I think more people should expect better safety play instead of settling for solid play IF they are healthy. I want safeties that not only can do whats asked of them but a bit more. I guess that's just wishful thinking! I hope the coaches will focus on upgrading this position. A great defense should have at least 1 very good safety not even great, just very good. It also wouldn't hurt if just one of the safeties was not injury prone
[ Edited by elguapo on Jun 9, 2021 at 3:11 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.

Mostert brings something to the table that isn't teachable…elite speed. End of the day I won't be shocked if they don't sign either.

DJ'a role can be replaced and someone like Kerr/Hurst/givens can do the same.

I like Williams but nickel DB is also replaceable. I think we have the replacement on the team.

Agree on Laken.

I disagree on Jones. Outside of maybe Kerr who we haven't seen yet, we don't have a starting 1 tech behind Kinlaw if he's playing there going forward.

I also think he's underrated as a pass rusher and even stopping the run.

He's the kind of player we assume we can replace and then our interior play gets worse and he's more valuable then you think.

If it's him or Givens I'll choose Givens but I want both long term.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.

Mostert brings something to the table that isn't teachable…elite speed. End of the day I won't be shocked if they don't sign either.

DJ'a role can be replaced and someone like Kerr/Hurst/givens can do the same.

I like Williams but nickel DB is also replaceable. I think we have the replacement on the team.

Agree on Laken.

It would be a mistake to allow Mostert to leave Imo. He's without question the most explosive player on the team, and Is perfect fit for Kyles scheme.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.

Mostert brings something to the table that isn't teachable…elite speed. End of the day I won't be shocked if they don't sign either.

DJ'a role can be replaced and someone like Kerr/Hurst/givens can do the same.

I like Williams but nickel DB is also replaceable. I think we have the replacement on the team.

Agree on Laken.

It would be a mistake to allow Mostert to leave Imo. He's without question the most explosive player on the team, and Is perfect fit for Kyles scheme.

I hope we keep Mostert but if he wants 5+ million per year which he may easily get, that may be too much for the niners bc they may figure his replacement is Trey Sermon and company. I hope Mostert splits a decent amount of reps (maybe 10 touches a game) so he stays healthier and this will most probably lower his asking price. A combo of Mostert/Sermon and worrying about Lance would be such a headache for Defenses. The Rams may never be able to beat us
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Mostert is gone, I'd re-sign Wilson before I sign Mostert, his whole "I want more money" last year rubbed me the wrong way.

As for Jones, I think he's worth keeping on a new multi year deal. Verrett & K'Waun need to be here another year, KW is a top 3 Slot CB, can't let him walk. Tartt is gone unless Hufanga shows he's not ready. I'm all for Laken, but it'd have to be before the season begins or ends, due to the dead money issues, his contract voids a few days after the super bowl.

Mostert brings something to the table that isn't teachable…elite speed. End of the day I won't be shocked if they don't sign either.

DJ'a role can be replaced and someone like Kerr/Hurst/givens can do the same.

I like Williams but nickel DB is also replaceable. I think we have the replacement on the team.

Agree on Laken.

It would be a mistake to allow Mostert to leave Imo. He's without question the most explosive player on the team, and Is perfect fit for Kyles scheme.

I hope we keep Mostert but if he wants 5+ million per year which he may easily get, that may be too much for the niners bc they may figure his replacement is Trey Sermon and company. I hope Mostert splits a decent amount of reps (maybe 10 touches a game) so he stays healthier and this will most probably lower his asking price. A combo of Mostert/Sermon and worrying about Lance would be such a headache for Defenses. The Rams may never be able to beat us

Mostert has been even more injury prone thn Jimmy G. 2017 got hurt in ST. 2018 broke his arm in TNF against the Raiders. 2019 his lone healthy season. 2020 got hurt most of the year after asking for a trade or a pay raise in the offseason.
Good player, but not durable, and plays the most replaceable position in football.
Share 49ersWebzone