Originally posted by miked1978:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:Yeah you right, nothing is just a coincidence, it's racist!!!Hmm kinda sounds like everything is potentially racist to you.Interesting how you logically jump from this single issue to "everything." I'm not surprised.
I already explained that. If the only two GMs being paid to lose also have Black coaches, it ought to get the question rolling in the head to any reasonable person who is also at least a novice in basic logic. Could it be a coincidence? Sure. Could it be related to killing two birds with one stone (tanking and getting rid of the Black guy you regret hiring)? Yes. It logically could.
How is paying to lose racist? I know you will come up with something so please enlighten me.
We must await the EVIDENCE before deciding what is likely among the possibilities, rather than resolutely stating as a matter of principle that no racial element exists.
So in my analogy if we hired a non minority then it would be racist? Got it.
No. You are failing to grasp the logical difference from what is alleged in this case and your company. The subtlety is escaping you. The two situations are not logically equivalent because they are not identical. Your company didn't circumvent a diversity program, and even in the case here with the Giants, we don't know to what degree race played a role.
I will try to be kind here: think harder. Think more meticulously. Think more systematically. And take a course on logiic
No. The question, which I asked you in my last post, is this: could it conceivably be related to racial discrimination or preferential treatment?