Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by All22:
I mean... I'm not sure Aaron Donald was even the best defensive player of his generation. Is he better than Sherman, Watt, Revis, Willis, Ed Reed, Polamalu etc?
That would make one of you (on all of this minus Watt).
Lol Donald the "paper" best ever as in on paper not with the eye test during actual games. Watt can't stay healthy to save his life. Ed Reed was 10x the player Donald is.
Do you have any sort of argument to back up these opinions? Because if not, I will simply stop responding.
Reed:
8x All Pro (5 1st team)
1 DPOY
Donald:
7x All Pro (all 7 1st team)
3 DPOY
The idea that Donald is 1/10th the player Reed was is laughably ridiculous. So do you want to add anything to your asinine opinion, or should I just start ignoring it? Your call.
Metrics like all pro don't mean utter jack. Recall that in 2013 before Brady had his second wind and became the utter GOAT, the NFL did a top 100 players in league history. The league itself named Jerry Rice the #1 player ever. Do you know how many NFL MVP awards the then greatest player in league history won? Surely 4. Five. Maybe six, right?
Correct answer is zero. In fact no receiver has ever won NFL MVP and a kicker has. Does that tell anything? It tells me the award process for the league is broken.
When you watch the games that's the eye test from watching Rams football I'm not impressed (when I say not impressed clearly he's extremely good but not impressed on par with his plaudits) with Donald and I suspect although I have no evidence he may be using roids. His head is suspiciously large his body looks downright silly and he had a rage incident throwing his helmet everywhere and getting ejected. Ed Reed is one of the greatest cover safeties of all time.