Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Fields has the second lowest completion percentage in the league at 55.6%. He's 27th in QBR. The only thing he does well is run. He has one decent game and people start jerking off over the guy. Is Lance better? We don't know yet. Let's wait until he's had a season to show what he can do.
Obviously, you don't watch much Bears football... and honestly I don't blame you. It's easy to stat hunt to judge a quarterback, let math and other people's metrics do the work for you. But if you watch the games you'll have seen significant improvement in Fields' game which aren't always reflected in the box score.
All I can tell you is that he's adjusting in what is really his first year in the NFL. He has a terrible offensive line and group of receivers and an offensive coordinator who is just now starting to vibe with him. They changed his footwork this year, and he's mentioned his struggles with timing his feet at the end of his drops.
I'll excuse your ignorance because you're not a Bears fan and I don't expect anyone to know these little details. It seems to me that 49er fans are a little upset that Fields has shown great promise, while Lance is stuck at the starting gate. To go out of your way to ignore all the details that goes into playing quarterback to reinforce the narrative that, "Haha fields suxxx", is petty and a little immature.
DabeegDeek, a poster who's routinely made ridiculous statements about Trey Lance (he's soft, he's a goofball, he has scared look in his eye… blah blah blah) has the audacity to call someone else, petty and immature.
Catchmaster never said Fields sucks, another projection on your part.
You give Fields all the excuses in the world but don't acknowledge any of Lance's legitimate excuses.
This is a textbook example of narcissism boys and girls. Wow.