Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
He wants an elite QB just like every other coach. He can run a successful pass game with a game manager level QB. Russell Wilson has shown he has been capable of that in the past and they got him for nothing. Fields is an explosive runner who can potentially be utilized in more than one way and they also got him for nothing. Neither are long term investments or indicators of what Smith (the OC, not HC or GM) ideally wants at the position.
You might be right about Fields being uncoachable. Who knows. You're putting an awful lot of weight in two comments he's made in his career, one of which isn't remotely negative. It's also odd coming from someone who was critical of his coaches in Chicago, lol. Coachable or not, he's in the conversation for worst starting QB in the league being kind.
It's apparent to me, over years of watching JF sulk and look disinterested. His comments were bench worthy. You don't finger point others in media particularly your coaches. Zach Wilson got benched for postgame comments. Read up on Fields a bit. Here's a bit: The animosity stemmed from Fields ignoring Foles while the veteran was trying to teach something to the rookie. According to Dunne, Foles and Fields "could not stand each other."
here is more:
"The part you don't like about it is that there's a teachable moment in every point of practice," Lucas added. "There's teachable moments in the building during the day, how you carry yourself as a quarterback. ... When you've got two guys that have won as much as Nick and seen as much as Andy, and you don't take that information in, because you're a little standoff-ish and a little abrasive, you're wasting that opportunity."
Lucas here is former Bears director of player personnel Josh Lucas, the Andy in the equation, is Dalton
https://fansided.com/posts/steelers-officially-have-reason-to-worry-about-justin-fields-relationship-with-russell-wilson-01hxsvejshkc