Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by dhp318:
Would much rather have Clowney than this guy
Clowney honestly is perfect. He is the prototype for a #2 DE.
Clowney was tearing it up for the Ravens against the Texans.
There are 119 users in the forums
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by dhp318:
Would much rather have Clowney than this guy
Clowney honestly is perfect. He is the prototype for a #2 DE.
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by dhp318:
Would much rather have Clowney than this guy
Clowney honestly is perfect. He is the prototype for a #2 DE.
Clowney was tearing it up for the Ravens against the Texans.
Originally posted by Since07:
He hasn't been amazing but I haven't seen him be bad either, the whole pass rush took a step back since Wilks took over. If he comes cheap I'd bring him back
He's still young too it took Armstead awhile to put it all together
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Since07:
He hasn't been amazing but I haven't seen him be bad either, the whole pass rush took a step back since Wilks took over. If he comes cheap I'd bring him back
He's still young too it took Armstead awhile to put it all together
No he's bad. Watch that Jones 53 yard run against us. Pretty good example of how this guy stinks it up on all fronts. Gets beat up by a WR. Doesn't defend his gaps. Overpursues. Then the icing which I've seen a lot….loses interest in the play. How many time have we seen this guy just prancing around, going through the motions, not even trying to get to the ball carrier.
He's lazy…I'd much rather see someone like Ferrell who plays like he's trying to make the team..
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
Originally posted by ritz126:Interesting…
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
we have more qb sacks than last year and i think we are 3rd in QB/ hits or something like that i think its one of the reasons why we consistantly lead NFL in interceptions past few years which is the pressure generated
Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
we have more qb sacks than last year and i think we are 3rd in QB/ hits or something like that i think its one of the reasons why we consistantly lead NFL in interceptions past few years which is the pressure generated
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by ritz126:Interesting…
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
we have more qb sacks than last year and i think we are 3rd in QB/ hits or something like that i think its one of the reasons why we consistantly lead NFL in interceptions past few years which is the pressure generated
WZ: it's not all about sacks. Pressures creating those ints. is good.
Also WZ: what's up with our dline not getting any sacks.
Originally posted by Disp:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by ritz126:Interesting…
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
we have more qb sacks than last year and i think we are 3rd in QB/ hits or something like that i think its one of the reasons why we consistantly lead NFL in interceptions past few years which is the pressure generated
WZ: it's not all about sacks. Pressures creating those ints. is good.
Also WZ: what's up with our dline not getting any sacks.
Last 5 games sack totals:
3, 2, 1, 2, 0
8 sacks in 5 games is atrocious especially for the amount of money invested on the d-line.
Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by Disp:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by ritz126:Interesting…
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I still wonder about the scheme Wilks plays. I really think it has something to do with the lack of QB sacks and consistent pressure. This front 7 is too talented to not be terrorizing offenses.
we have more qb sacks than last year and i think we are 3rd in QB/ hits or something like that i think its one of the reasons why we consistantly lead NFL in interceptions past few years which is the pressure generated
WZ: it's not all about sacks. Pressures creating those ints. is good.
Also WZ: what's up with our dline not getting any sacks.
Last 5 games sack totals:
3, 2, 1, 2, 0
8 sacks in 5 games is atrocious especially for the amount of money invested on the d-line.
but again we had similar production last year im sure we can find an 5 game strech where we had 8 sacks. And it isnt like we are league bottom or anything. Including last playoff game we average about 2.7 sacks/game last year was 2.5
honestly the biggst reeason for why it feels this way is ast year Bosa was a DPOTY and this year he wasnt close to that type of raw production