Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
There are 236 users in the forums
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
He usually does a fantastic job outlining how we can do it, can you show the same for why we can't?
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
He usually does a fantastic job outlining how we can do it, can you show the same for why we can't?
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
He usually does a fantastic job outlining how we can do it, can you show the same for why we can't?
Well let me rephrase that. I should've used won't instead of can't. I will agree with AB on whatever his numbers say. It wouldn't be a smart move. This team has to invest these funds into other areas of the team. How can they justify four d lineman making 20 million a year and can't pay a decent guard or right tackle to block? Or pay a decent slot CB? It's would be really bad way of constructing your team to dump so much money into one position. Just like paying Deebo and BA both over 20 million a year when they are a low volume passing team. It makes no sense.
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Originally posted by SLCNiner:
Originally posted by 9erson3:
Unpopular opinion but this is reversed. It will be Deeb who is traded for a one plus. Brandon is a better route runner IMO. He's Brock's go to boy. Brandon plus CMC=Deeb in a sense. Brandon and Brock have had some really strong connections.
The wallet really starts to tighten next season. A one plus for Deeb. And don't get me wrong. Love Deeb and not a hater but he feels like an overpaid decoy/blocker at times. Brandon has stepped into the spotlight and to me the one to keep. I'm worried Trent is going to retire one way or the other after this year. We need to buy or draft highly some OL pieces. Deeb could be a casualty of need over luxury item.
If Chase balls he needs to stay.
Can not afford to lose Deebo, watching the offense while he's been out should have told you that. He brings things to the offense and forces defenses to do exactly what Kyle wants. When Deebo has been out, even the run game is suffering. We need both Deebo and Aiyuk.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We can keep BA, Deebo, & Chase long term, might cost us a Aaron Banks, & Randy Gregory(pretty much a guarantee he gets cut or traded if Chase is re-signed), also guys like Lenoir would be casualties.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?
I know we can't keep everyone, I still believe we can keep Mooney, AA, & Dre, plus keep BA, Huf, & Chase, just means we lose Banks, Lenoir, Gregory, but the deals would have to be structured friendly, I've already started with projected contracts for all but Chase, & Lenoir.
https://49erscap.com/index.php/2024-offseason-plan/
You'll see we can keep the core together, and I didn't even touch Deebo's deal, I also didn't release or redo Gregory, as I want to see Chase play for us for a bit to see how he does before I say extend him for sure.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Need him to have 8 sacks against the Jags before even arguing on resigning him.
Bro he can have 11 sacks. They can't afford him.
AB says otherwise. He said it was possible
He said we can add him while keeping BA. No brainer.
We all love AB but he thinks and wants us to keep everybody. It's just not going to happen. You really think they are going to add another 20 million a year plus contract to this d line?