There are 202 users in the forums
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
He didn't sign though. Not the first time something like this has happened.
Originally posted by titan:
So we wouldn't get some type of reprimand if we decide not to sign him a few weeks from now and leave him hangin after all the LB position are filled?
Originally posted by titan:
So we wouldn't get some type of reprimand if we decide not to sign him a few weeks from now and leave him hangin after all the LB position are filled?
Originally posted by lamontb:
Money talks and Texas has no state taxes
Originally posted by titan:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
He didn't sign though. Not the first time something like this has happened.
So we wouldn't get some type of reprimand if we decide not to sign him a few weeks from now and leave him hangin after all the LB position are filled?
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
Nah. They literally did not have him signed. They're also not cutting down to 53 yet.
Originally posted by titan:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
Nah. They literally did not have him signed. They're also not cutting down to 53 yet.
He definitely would be in the 53
Originally posted by crabman82:
In this scenario the players agent would be fired
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
Originally posted by titan:
You would think this is one situation where you'd get compensated with a draft pick. You literally had a person signed on a 53 and committed, now you have 52.
LIke a handshake deal, means SFA until the ink is dry and it's official.
Originally posted by titan:
So we wouldn't get some type of reprimand if we decide not to sign him a few weeks from now and leave him hangin after all the LB position are filled?