Quitter De'Vondre Campbell-Softer than a bag of marshmallows

Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Washed

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by BYisGod:
Washed up, but hey, we need bodies and he's a known commodity who brings leadership. Can't complain about this signing.

Seems to have fallen off in the past few seasons. I'm guessing he is plan B in case Winters/Graham don't step it up next season.

Originally posted by jimrat:
Signing all these old fogies

Originally posted by pd24:

Originally posted by Wrathman:
Is he better than Burks? Burks is slow and can't cover anything.

He is better, but let's hope Winters beats him out and this guy is a backup

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
I don't think that's as good as Kendricks. But I like some depth there and not leaving the position with a huge hole.

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.