Quitter De'Vondre Campbell-Softer than a bag of marshmallows

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.

Yeah I think he may get taken off the field on 3rd downs but who knows. You're assuming that means I think he's the 3rd linebacker. I never said that either. If he's in there on base downs that would mean I think he's LB number 2. He doesn't have to be in there every down to stay LB number 2. Formations change personnel change on down to down bases. Some downs he could be LB 2 some he could be LB 3. Come on you're better than this.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.

Yeah I think he may get taken off the field on 3rd downs but who knows. You're assuming that means I think he's the 3rd linebacker. I never said that either. If he's in there on base downs that would mean I think he's LB number 2. He doesn't have to be in there every down to stay LB number 2. Formations change personnel change on down to down bases. Some downs he could be LB 2 some he could be LB 3. Come on you're better than this.

You're assuming that I'm better than this.
If he's in on base downs, that means he's one of the top 3 LBs. Right?

I think (assume) Campbell is a safety blanket in case Winters or Graham cannot win the WILL spot. If neither of them can, then that could very well mean that Campbell is the WILL.

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.

Yeah I think he may get taken off the field on 3rd downs but who knows. You're assuming that means I think he's the 3rd linebacker. I never said that either. If he's in there on base downs that would mean I think he's LB number 2. He doesn't have to be in there every down to stay LB number 2. Formations change personnel change on down to down bases. Some downs he could be LB 2 some he could be LB 3. Come on you're better than this.

You're assuming that I'm better than this.
If he's in on base downs, that means he's one of the top 3 LBs. Right?

I think (assume) Campbell is a safety blanket in case Winters or Graham cannot win the WILL spot. If neither of them can, then that could very well mean that Campbell is the WILL.

I don't know what to tell you. I'm trying to give you credit. You've been around for a long time. Will, Mike, Sam, whatever you want to call it. I think my last post prior to this pretty much sums it up. Personnel changes on a down to down bases. You can put whatever name or number on it you want.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Salty in here. Come over to the OL thread where it's peaceful.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Salty in here. Come over to the OL thread where it's peaceful.

Originally posted by thl408:
You're assuming that I'm better than this.
If he's in on base downs, that means he's one of the top 3 LBs. Right?

I think (assume) Campbell is a safety blanket in case Winters or Graham cannot win the WILL spot. If neither of them can, then that could very well mean that Campbell is the WILL.

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by thl408:

Originally posted by Howlett49:

Originally posted by illinois9er:

Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.

Yeah I think he may get taken off the field on 3rd downs but who knows. You're assuming that means I think he's the 3rd linebacker. I never said that either. If he's in there on base downs that would mean I think he's LB number 2. He doesn't have to be in there every down to stay LB number 2. Formations change personnel change on down to down bases. Some downs he could be LB 2 some he could be LB 3. Come on you're better than this.

You're assuming that I'm better than this.
If he's in on base downs, that means he's one of the top 3 LBs. Right?

I think (assume) Campbell is a safety blanket in case Winters or Graham cannot win the WILL spot. If neither of them can, then that could very well mean that Campbell is the WILL.

I don't know what to tell you. I'm trying to give you credit. You've been around for a long time. Will, Mike, Sam, whatever you want to call it. I think my last post prior to this pretty much sums it up. Personnel changes on a down to down bases. You can put whatever name or number on it you want.

I've lost track of what we're discussing. Glad Campbell is on the team. He should provide a baseline level of play as a vet in case Winters/Graham don't step it up. To your point, it's possible Campbell plays a base personnel role while getting off the field for a more athletic LB in passing downs that provides better coverage.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by thl408:
You're assuming that I'm better than this.
If he's in on base downs, that means he's one of the top 3 LBs. Right?

I think (assume) Campbell is a safety blanket in case Winters or Graham cannot win the WILL spot. If neither of them can, then that could very well mean that Campbell is the WILL.

this made me chuckle ngl

Originally posted by Howlett49:


Happy Friday

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Damnit Vander Esch was just released

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by BMoore56:
Damnit Vander Esch was just released

Probably retiring

Originally posted by 49ersvsPackers:
I don't think he is as good as he was in 2021. He's going to struggle a bit lol.