Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by BobS:
There are plenty of quarterbacks that look better in the box score than on the field and vice versa. Kirk Cousins is the current shining example of a guy who looks a lot better on paper than in person.
I get that. Very well aware. But how many quarterbacks....hell, how many players in sports history can you say are top 10 of all time but the stats aren't even close to reflecting that?
I mean seriously. I get that stats don't always tell the story. But if you want to make the claim that Elway is top 10 of all time, why don't the numbers come close to supporting that? Every single player that is widely considered top 10 player in every single sport can use stats to backup his case. But for some reason, people are willing to dismiss statistics entirely with Elway. Makes no sense to me.
Elway was a #1 pick who from 84-89 had a record of 60-27-1 including playing in 2 Superbowl's. Numbers didn't matter as much back then. Most people just saw the game score in the local paper or 2 highlight plays from the national half time show. Take a random box score from 1986 (his first pro bowl season): they won the game 38-17 against KC (who was 7-4) and you assume Elway put up big numbers but he was 15-29 for 196 yards no touchdowns and 3 sacks.
[ Edited by Jcool on Aug 26, 2024 at 9:59 AM ]