There are 266 users in the forums

Levi's Stadium pics and info...

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by Morgan49:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
Originally posted by YaBoy24:
My brother and I are coming down to the 10/21 game from Oregon...... is there any tailgate meetups?

go to the niner empire tailgate, trust me.


no lie

That's the tailgate for you if you wanna party like a rockstar. No doubt. If you wanna chill and watch the morning games and shoot the sh!t, stop by ours. Choose accordingly.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by Morgan49:
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
Originally posted by YaBoy24:
My brother and I are coming down to the 10/21 game from Oregon...... is there any tailgate meetups?

go to the niner empire tailgate, trust me.


no lie

That's the tailgate for you if you wanna party like a rockstar. No doubt. If you wanna chill and watch the morning games and shoot the sh!t, stop by ours. Choose accordingly.

I will see you twice again this year
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
That's the tailgate for you if you wanna party like a rockstar. No doubt. If you wanna chill and watch the morning games and shoot the sh!t, stop by ours. Choose accordingly.

Both sound good to me I'll send you a PM closer to the date, or is there a FB group I should join?
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney
Did they take away parking lots Red 6 & 8 (Golf Course)? Don't see it on the parking map anymore.
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.
[ Edited by captveg on Aug 27, 2018 at 10:54 AM ]
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.

lol omg please continue this is fun
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.

lol omg please continue this is fun



Thanks for reminding me why I blocked you before. And once again.
Originally posted by captveg:


Thanks for reminding me why I blocked you before. And once again.

Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.

Lol I went to universal studios a few weeks back and they have misters everywhere and i didn't see any lifeguards.
Originally posted by susweel:
Lol I went to universal studios a few weeks back and they have misters everywhere and i didn't see any lifeguards.

.

Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.

lol omg please continue this is fun



Thanks for reminding me why I blocked you before. And once again.

I guess you don't like logic?

Also, I feel very special now
Why would anybody want misters at a football game, anyway? WhoTF wants to be wet and sticky at a game? (Giggity)
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by susweel:
Lol I went to universal studios a few weeks back and they have misters everywhere and i didn't see any lifeguards.

.

Universal has insurance against theme park level concerns, including water-based rides like Jurassic Park, or their water parks in general in Florida. They more than likely have all their parks covered under the same policies. Their liability in general is far more excessive and expensive to cover than a sports stadium. The 49ers aren't putting in roller coasters at Levi's anytime soon, either.
[ Edited by captveg on Aug 27, 2018 at 1:35 PM ]
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,409
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by captveg:
FAA regulations would make this design impossible for Levi's. See: four pillars that double the height of the structure.

What are the actual regulations preventing this out of curiosity?

FAA regulations about the height of structures close to the landing paths of planes going into/out of San Jose International. My understanding is that Levi's current height is right up against the limit.

It can be done. Just like the misters can be done. It would be cost-prohibitive though. Which is why they should just say that instead of lying about it being impossible.

Misters cannot be done, because of moisture gathering on the walkways and creating slip & fall liability. Because the temperature is mid-80s and not actually 100+ the water from the misters won't evaporate sufficiently enough.

What happens with the slip and fall liability when it rains?

Since it's not moisture created artificially by actions of the business they are not liable, i.e. Act of God clauses. Now, if something in the design/condition of a walkway was to cause an unusual gathering of water from the rain, such as clogged drains, one could argue the business is liable, but that's a very specific circumstance.

Just saw this. All of it is wrong lol. You literally made crap up.

I wonder how any public pool stays in business?

Or waterpark

Or disney

They buy insurance for public pool services and similar venues. And they have notices everywhere as well as lifeguards. 49ers aren't going to buy that same insurance and hire lifeguards for misters.

Lol I went to universal studios a few weeks back and they have misters everywhere and i didn't see any lifeguards.

They're only allowed to come on when it's 100+ degrees. You know, evaporation, insurance, and stuff.
Search Share 49ersWebzone