7pm PT tonight. Will be interesting to see if they made any changes from their initial renderings.
[ Edited by mayo63 on Jul 14, 2009 at 5:08 AM ]
There are 113 users in the forums
Originally posted by mayo63:
We should be getting some new pictures. The council meeting is scheduled for
7pm PT tonight. Will be interesting to see if they made any changes from their initial renderings.
Originally posted by dankmeistr:
Has anyone else noticed all the negative articles on the 49ers move/stadium deal with Santa Clara from the SF Chronicle? It seems like they are working for the city by pumping out negative information in order to sway popular opinion. I find it very funny, and interesting at the same time.
Originally posted by dankmeistr:
Has anyone else noticed all the negative articles on the 49ers move/stadium deal with Santa Clara from the SF Chronicle? It seems like they are working for the city by pumping out negative information in order to sway popular opinion. I find it very funny, and interesting at the same time.
Originally posted by SJniner7:Originally posted by dankmeistr:
Has anyone else noticed all the negative articles on the 49ers move/stadium deal with Santa Clara from the SF Chronicle? It seems like they are working for the city by pumping out negative information in order to sway popular opinion. I find it very funny, and interesting at the same time.
I was going to say something about that. There has been a huge flux of articles from the Chronicle. It is irritating that these losers are discrediting santa clara because they can't get their act together. Why the hell would the niners want to be in the worst part of SF anyway? While I am a drinker, I do not think the cheese and wine fans want to be in that area.
Let me also say that I do not care if they stay in SF or go to santa clara. The main point is, they NEED a new stadium. Why does the Chronicle have to publish such garbage? purely selfish, i say.....
Originally posted by billybonka:
Bill Walsh field at Google Stadium lol
Originally posted by teeohh:
i'm gonna miss it
Originally posted by SJniner7:Originally posted by dankmeistr:
Has anyone else noticed all the negative articles on the 49ers move/stadium deal with Santa Clara from the SF Chronicle? It seems like they are working for the city by pumping out negative information in order to sway popular opinion. I find it very funny, and interesting at the same time.
I was going to say something about that. There has been a huge flux of articles from the Chronicle. It is irritating that these losers are discrediting santa clara because they can't get their act together. Why the hell would the niners want to be in the worst part of SF anyway? While I am a drinker, I do not think the cheese and wine fans want to be in that area.
Let me also say that I do not care if they stay in SF or go to santa clara. The main point is, they NEED a new stadium. Why does the Chronicle have to publish such garbage? purely selfish, i say.....