Underappreciated: Jim Tomsula

Team Hedgehog

Originally posted by Jesu80ncleats:

Originally posted by 49ersPrincipality:

Tomsula? Who needs Mike Singletary 2.0.
That's exactly what Tomsula would be

Tomsula would be one if my last choices, but lets be fair, how do you know he would be Singletary 2.0? None of us know if he is qualified or not.

He can't even get a DC job, let alone head coach. That speaks volumes in itself right there. Singletary at least was assistant head coach for a few years

Hope not. 49ers need an xs & os Coach on offense, someone that can teach a QB, teach a scheme. Keep Tomesula as DLINE coach.

Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
Hope not. 49ers need an xs & os Coach on offense, someone that can teach a QB, teach a scheme. Keep Tomesula as DLINE coach.

I'm w/you on that.

By all accounts JT is a great guy, a great motivator a good D-line coach but couldnt think of a more unattractive candidate for a head coaching job. We have no information about his X's and O's , hes only been a head coach in NFL Europe, we have no idea about what kind of staff he could assemble. By all accounts he would need Baalke's help with this. Its such a lame duck coach, A total Yes man that these 2 Bufoons are looking for. I am super bias because I am a big Harbs supporter and could be wrong about JT but man I just dont see him as a head coach.

Originally posted by ayleswbj11:
By all accounts JT is a great guy, a great motivator a good D-line coach but couldnt think of a more unattractive candidate for a head coaching job. We have no information about his X's and O's , hes only been a head coach in NFL Europe, we have no idea about what kind of staff he could assemble. By all accounts he would need Baalke's help with this. Its such a lame duck coach, A total Yes man that these 2 Bufoons are looking for. I am super bias because I am a big Harbs supporter and could be wrong about JT but man I just dont see him as a head coach.

We don't know what staff any candidates can/will assemble. Since you "don't know" as you already stated then why is it you leap to assuming Tomsula would need Baalke's help.

I hope that we don't stoop to this. This would set back the franchise; back to the mid 2000s style of running the team.

Originally posted by goldlame2013:
All I gotta say on this is when this fails, I absolutely guarantee it will, Baalke needs to go next.

just because you act like you wish for us to fail does not mean we will.

We knew for sure that Harbs was bringing his staff , Roman , Fangio an so on. They talked Harbs into keep Tomsula an Rathman. JH had his own staff. It's real uncertain who tomsula could bring in or who he has in mind

Kubiak or Pete Carmichael from New Orleans IMO.

Originally posted by 5timechamps:

Kubiak or Pete Carmichael from New Orleans IMO.

Who's pete Carmichael?

Dont think it would be a good idea with Tomsula leading the way. He can fire up the players on the sideline, but gameplanning, making adjustments during game and managing a game is different.

Originally posted by ayleswbj11:

By all accounts JT is a great guy, a great motivator a good D-line coach but couldnt think of a more unattractive candidate for a head coaching job. We have no information about his X's and O's , hes only been a head coach in NFL Europe, we have no idea about what kind of staff he could assemble. By all accounts he would need Baalke's help with this. Its such a lame duck coach, A total Yes man that these 2 Bufoons are looking for. I am super bias because I am a big Harbs supporter and could be wrong about JT but man I just dont see him as a head coach.

"Buffoons" hahaha
No I believe your assessment is right. JT is a nice guy and a DL motivator, but it ends there

lol f**k no.

Here is the other side: a great deal of the success of our D, and especially our D line can be attributed to him. So, not only would we acquire a most questionable HC, we'd lose one of the best position coaches in the league. Our Offense would definitely not improve, but I'm afraid our Defense would regress.