SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS VS SEATTLE SEAHAWKS GAMEDAY THREAD (Week 2)

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:
You also left out the original point of the thread - that our D wasn't giving up runs in the first half.

it was also 5-0 at half.

Yes. Again, the point is our D gave up 5.2 yards per carry.

not sure i get what your point is?

posted this in a couple places, wanted everyone to see it

If I could put my professor spectacles on for a second...

Here's another way to look at this, guys. Imagine the performance of this football team as a sine wave. We'll assume the function is centered along the x-axis, which is our normal level of play. What we are concerned with here is the amplitude of the function--how far above and below our baseline our performance fluctuates.

In 2011, we had a very consistent team. By this I mean we were generally stable week-to-week in our level of performance--we occasionally dipped below our normal quality of play (Baltimore, Arizona) but not very far, and never lost any game more than 10 points. Conversely, when we needed to elevate in the playoffs it wasn't there.

Starting in 2012, we started to see a very large variance in the quality of our play from week to week. We laid eggs in Minnesota, against New York and St. Louis, and in Seattle. Our poor performances were really, really poor. But on the flip side, when we were good we were transcendently good--take wins in New England and in the playoffs versus Green Bay and Atlanta. The Super Bowl may have been the most illustrative microcosm of this phenomenon, in that we played waaaay below our talent level in the first half and were unbelievable in the second.

We are undeniably a very dynamic team. But I submit that the price of this dynamism, of this ability to play at that very high level at times, is that we also swing very far in the opposite direction, so that when we are not good, we are very not good.

So, fellas, let's take this with a grain of salt and as solace that we will be okay. Nothing is necessarily broken...it's a long season, and we all know how good we can be.

Originally posted by susweel:
lol

English loves to have power over men can yall confirm???????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by SF49ersCA:

Originally posted by Rocket4989:
kinda like how eric reid is someone important for this team. one day he is going to be a stud.

Like AJ Jenkins and LaFUMBLE James and Kyle Williams Baalke's 49er heroes? lolz

if u saw the game, the 49ers D suck with out him.

Where the f**k is that other resident f*g here valrod???????????

Originally posted by SF49ersCA:

Where is that limey homo moderator from jolly England English?

Heard English sucked a massive cock to get the mod gig here can yall confirm????????

this will end well

That moron Baalke has 2 of the biggest goats in 49ers history still on the f**king team Kyle Williams & LaFUMBLE James!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by SF49ersCA:
Jenkins isn't Baalke's only fail there are lots more did yall enjoy Cordarrelle Patterson's 105 yard TD today he's the WR/KR Baalke passed over and how about his big draft pick Reid can't even make it through his 2nd NFL game!!!!! lolz

Dude give that s**t a rest. We needed a safety infi more than we needed a WR. Crabtrees injury came after the draft. We got a stud, a professional, and a future team leader. In fact he got hurt because he was playing to hard. Anyways congrats on insulting your future FS and trying to make yourself look good with hindsight logic.

Originally posted by SF49ersCA:
Loved the LaFUMBLE James pick too.

Baalke loves useless midgets.

Troll account? I say yes! GTFO

Speaking of ahole mods did you all know taHOEgirl was a douch bag!!!!!!!!!!!!

Millions of 49ers fans and she is down to 3700 active members on her little board!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMFAO

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:
You also left out the original point of the thread - that our D wasn't giving up runs in the first half.

+ Show all quotes
it was also 5-0 at half.

Yes. Again, the point is our D gave up 5.2 yards per carry.

not sure i get what your point is?

Our D line got pushed around, then some guy claimed there were no runs more than 3 ypc in the first half. I looked it up and he was wrong. Not sure why you got involved. The rest of the D played well, but not as good as Seattle's D against our O - clearly.

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:
You also left out the original point of the thread - that our D wasn't giving up runs in the first half.

it was also 5-0 at half.

Yes. Again, the point is our D gave up 5.2 yards per carry.

The real point is that we shut them down their 1st 6 drives but whatever Father our defense blew because they literally played 3/5 of the snaps.

Originally posted by eonblue:
dude they were giving up 5 yards max in the 1st half and most of their runs were around 3 yards. Look at the passing stats in the 1st half. Nothing. Nada. Dominated. We made the one dimensional and it showed.

Originally posted by father49er:
Our D line got pushed around, then some guy claimed there were no runs more than 3 ypc in the first half. I looked it up and he was wrong. Not sure why you got involved. The rest of the D played well, but not as good as Seattle's D against our O - clearly.

I said what?

Literally 3 runs over 5 yards. I didn't have the stats but thanks you did the research for me. 10 out of 18 runs would qualify as most right?

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:
You also left out the original point of the thread - that our D wasn't giving up runs in the first half.

it was also 5-0 at half.

+ Show all quotes
Yes. Again, the point is our D gave up 5.2 yards per carry.

not sure i get what your point is?

Our D line got pushed around, then some guy claimed there were no runs more than 3 ypc in the first half. I looked it up and he was wrong. Not sure why you got involved. The rest of the D played well, but not as good as Seattle's D against our O - clearly.

Private message him if you don't want others commenting on what you say. Our D Line didn't get pushed around. Just because they had a few big plays in the first half doesn't mean they were having success running the ball.

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by father49er:
You also left out the original point of the thread - that our D wasn't giving up runs in the first half.

it was also 5-0 at half.

+ Show all quotes
Yes. Again, the point is our D gave up 5.2 yards per carry.

not sure i get what your point is?

Our D line got pushed around, then some guy claimed there were no runs more than 3 ypc in the first half. I looked it up and he was wrong. Not sure why you got involved. The rest of the D played well, but not as good as Seattle's D against our O - clearly.

Our defense also lost our starting NT and then things went down hill after that compounded by the loss of Reid