LISTEN: The 49ers' Season From Hell Finally Ends, What's Next? →

There are 342 users in the forums

Hall of Fame LB, Patrick Willis

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

get out of here with your reasonable posts!

imho Willis deserves the NFL HOF but i'm also an emotional fan
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?
[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Jul 1, 2021 at 11:00 AM ]
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.

Terrell Davis got in on a shortened career. I don't see why Willis can't also
Originally posted by luv49rs:
Terrell Davis got in on a shortened career. I don't see why Willis can't also

Won two superbowls and was named NFL MVP and Super Bowl MVP.
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by luv49rs:
Terrell Davis got in on a shortened career. I don't see why Willis can't also

Won two superbowls and was named NFL MVP and Super Bowl MVP.

Super bowl comes down to the overall team effort and good coaching though, rather than an Individual player.
Originally posted by luv49rs:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.

Terrell Davis got in on a shortened career. I don't see why Willis can't also
i think two SB championships and 1 SB MVP helped

IF we would have won in 2012, no doubt he would have been first ballot
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by luv49rs:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.

Terrell Davis got in on a shortened career. I don't see why Willis can't also
i think two SB championships and 1 SB MVP helped

IF we would have won in 2012, no doubt he would have been first ballot

Definitely. I think awards/achievements play a factor when It comes down to being elected to the hall of fame.
[ Edited by Sickaa on Jul 2, 2021 at 5:41 AM ]
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.

I admit my idea of a HOF player is probably a little stricter than most. When I visited the HOF I saw a lot of players in there that I wouldn't have considered HOF players. Their stats might have been good enough but I just didn't consider them HOF material.

I think there are actually too many players in the HOF. If I have to look up a players stats and compare him to other players then he isn't a HOF. The key word here is Fame. If the name jumps out right away when you are asked who were the greatest QBs, RBs, LBs or whatever then they're HOF. Nobody is going to argue about Jim Brown or Barry Sanders. Same for Joe Montana andJohn Unitas. They were undeniably the best in their generation if you asked anyone that saw them play.

I know most people don't agree with the way I look at it, but I think the HOF should be reserved for the all time greats. Not just players who were good. I might include Willis because he was really good and dominant for about 5 years. Taylor was good and a valuable part of the team but he wasn't dominant. Part of that was playing with Rice who stole the show. Taylor had some great moments but I don't know if he had enough.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Super bowl comes down to the overall team effort and good coaching though, rather than an Individual player.

Not in the eyes of the media. It's an individual sport
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
i think two SB championships and 1 SB MVP helped

IF we would have won in 2012, no doubt he would have been first ballot

And also won a dpoy. How close did he come to winning it? Was he ever voted top 5?
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Remember that the HOF isn't the hall of good. Taylor's numbers and Willis's numbers are good but maybe not enough to convince the people that vote. Same with Dwight. He's known for 'The Catch' but his career numbers may not be enough for HOF.

They're in the 49er fans HOF.

Hall of fame should be for players who we're considered one of the best at their position for a period of time Imo. Not just because someone played for a long time.. That's just my view on it though.
whats the eligibility.. playing 1 year ?

Quality over quantity. 5 years or more should be good though.

I admit my idea of a HOF player is probably a little stricter than most. When I visited the HOF I saw a lot of players in there that I wouldn't have considered HOF players. Their stats might have been good enough but I just didn't consider them HOF material.

I think there are actually too many players in the HOF. If I have to look up a players stats and compare him to other players then he isn't a HOF. The key word here is Fame. If the name jumps out right away when you are asked who were the greatest QBs, RBs, LBs or whatever then they're HOF. Nobody is going to argue about Jim Brown or Barry Sanders. Same for Joe Montana andJohn Unitas. They were undeniably the best in their generation if you asked anyone that saw them play.

I know most people don't agree with the way I look at it, but I think the HOF should be reserved for the all time greats. Not just players who were good. I might include Willis because he was really good and dominant for about 5 years. Taylor was good and a valuable part of the team but he wasn't dominant. Part of that was playing with Rice who stole the show. Taylor had some great moments but I don't know if he had enough.
same here, 5 years.. then any player can make it unless they get help with Super bowls
I think this forum shows why the HOF selections are often controversial. Everyone has their own opinions, biases and reasons for putting someone in the HOF. I think the players understand that and don't get all twisted in a knot if they aren't selected. They know what they did on the field and so do the players that the faced. The HOF may be a nice honor but it doesn't define their career.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I think this forum shows why the HOF selections are often controversial. Everyone has their own opinions, biases and reasons for putting someone in the HOF. I think the players understand that and don't get all twisted in a knot if they aren't selected. They know what they did on the field and so do the players that the faced. The HOF may be a nice honor but it doesn't define their career.
It's an exclusive club, where they get invited to private parties and money making oppotunities. It doesn't define their career, but i'm sure they would like to be part of this group
Search Share 49ersWebzone