Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by jonesadrian:
I think he means being in charge of the entire team and not just his specialty. However he said it himself players want teachers. we have to admit that this coaching staff from top to bottom is filled with teachers. Not just names, not the sexy named guys. Guys that are known teachers, most who have held higher positions. Guys who players know they're getting great instructions. Our guys don't really need motivation. Motivation only lasted so long.. as seen by Harbaugh. The players did not quit on him but the motivation wasn't enough to get us over the hump. We needed x's and o's and we didn't have that. Maybe now we do. The players on this team want to win, they work hard and they love Tomsula. Now with some proper instruction, especially on the offensive side of the ball we could be even better than we were the past 4 years..
Not sure how you could know that. We have no idea if most of these coaches are "teachers". Is Geep Chryst a teacher? Judging from his work with Kap if he is one he is not a very good teacher. Is Eric Mangini a teacher? I guess he was a good DB coach in NE, but he has failed at every other job. Is Steve Logan a good teacher? IDK he sounds great on the radio, but what does that really mean? Is Jason Tarver a good teacher? Not sure he was a very good OLB coach with the 49ers and he definitely wasn't a good DC. Chris Foerster track record isn't that good. Judging form his history Clancy Pendergast seems better suited for DB coach then ILB coach but with this team its a pretty easy job. Scott Brown hasn't coached in 4 years.
Chryst is a good teacher, compare Kaps mechanics and footwork to his peers.. he is only rivaled by Luck. No awkward backward passes from a normal pocket (Cam, Wilson, Rg3) and when given adequate time he sees the entire field...displayed on numerous miraculous plays across the entire field (Crabtree 4th and 10 for 50 yards comes to mind) Chryst was not in charge of calling the plays or constructing the offense just making sure Kap was sound and followed what Roman wanted him to do.
Mangini is a great defensive mind by all accounts. Nobody says different. He is just not a head coach. If he was our head coach i would be upset. He is our defensive coordinator and you must admit a man with his defensive background and mind given this amount of talent should be able to do some good. Fangio was able to right? He also would be better served as the DC than the tight ends coach right?
Logan has had success everywhere he's went. He had success with Tomsula actually. He's taken a school not known for football and made it prominent in college football as a head coach. He also turned Matt Ryan from a marginal pick to a 1st round ready made NFL starter.
Tarver was a very good coach. The raiders defense actually improved under him with the gross lack of talent they had. Consider they were starting corners that we cut because they were ineffective. Add in and aged Woodson and old tuck and only Khalil Mack, nobody is a miracle worker and with these linebackers he doesn't have to be.
Foerster can't be any worse than the guys we've had the past 4 years as we've seen them be really good at trap blocking and pulling and absolutely nothing else.
Pender got offers to be a defensive coordinator in college but turned them down to coach here. Before you say whoopty do, our old guy Leavitt took a job as a defensive coordinator in college otherwise he would be here with us.
And our Defensive backs coach has true pedigree in turning defensive backs around and improving them, teaching them the game. he played the position and held a defensive coordinator position leading a few great defenses.
So yes i would say i could confidently say from top to bottom we have a teaching coaching staff
wouldn't you?