
Safeties rotate to reveal Cover2 Man


There are 202 users in the forums
Originally posted by shmuck:
Do you think we'll see Armstead and Buckner standing up? I don't think it would be a good idea because they'll have problems with their pad level. And it would be harder for them to use their length to an advantage.
In other news thanks for doing these breakdowns again. This is easily the best thread during the off-season and what keeps me coming back to the zone.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Nice breakdown. Seeing these breakdown's has me a bit nervous. Love some of the pressure but the shallow crossing routes are wide open and will be hard to defend. Love the movement and confusion. Should eat a your qb alive
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Nice breakdown. Seeing these breakdown's has me a bit nervous. Love some of the pressure but the shallow crossing routes are wide open and will be hard to defend. Love the movement and confusion. Should eat a your qb alive
If you are referring to the last play in the series of SD cutups, I think the LB might have blown an assignment. There was also the play where a safety was expected to make up ground and cover a shallow crosser. Below is how they normally handle shallow crossing routes - with pattern matching LBs.
The drag route gets picked up by the LB on the other side of the formation. This is very similar to what Fangio did.
Same concept as above with the drag route getting matched.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Nice breakdown. Seeing these breakdown's has me a bit nervous. Love some of the pressure but the shallow crossing routes are wide open and will be hard to defend. Love the movement and confusion. Should eat a your qb alive
If you are referring to the last play in the series of SD cutups, I think the LB might have blown an assignment. There was also the play where a safety was expected to make up ground and cover a shallow crosser. Below is how they normally handle shallow crossing routes - with pattern matching LBs.
The drag route gets picked up by the LB on the other side of the formation. This is very similar to what Fangio did.
Same concept as above with the drag route getting matched.
Exactly what i was thinking. On one play that safety had a s**t load of ground to cover. I like how the LB's match up on the shallow routes. It does look like a Fangio defense.
Love the aggressiveness. I could see Bow getting 6/7 sacks this year. Do you get the sense that he moves his linebackers around as well? Like letting Brooks and Bow switch for a play just to confuse the offense.
Originally posted by thl408:
Some observations of Jim O'Neil's scheme as how it was ran in CLE 2015. I watched the following games to get a gauge for what he liked to do when defending the pass: @SD, DEN, ARI, @CIN, @PIT. List of observations with the top of the list being what I feel most confident about stating, then less confident going down the list. Some of this is a repeat of what I've posted in the Jim O'Neil thread, but I wanted to put the cut ups in one place.
- Predominantly man coverage scheme; only saw zone coverage from CBs on 3rd and long situations.
- Create confusion for pass protection by crowding the line of scrimmage; also having players stand up or move around pre-snap
- Will mix between 3-4 and 4-3 fronts (link to post in JoN thread)
- Lots of blitz packages that involve LBs, safeties; likes to show pre-snap pressure on 3rd downs
- Rooted in Cover1; will also play Quarters, Cover2
- ILBs will pattern match drag routes; CBs rarely pattern match
- mix of press and off coverage alignment; more press
- any CB lined up across from a WR with a plus split is on an island as safety help will roll away from that side of the field
- Likes to rob weak side Curl zone with safety
I'll use the @SD and ARI games to show some of these observations. Most of the plays shown are on 3rd down, which I put more weight on, and think can best characterize what a defense wants to do, or feels comfortable doing.
It's worth mentioning that in man coverage, the CBs want to use proper leverage/positioning to funnel their WRs towards the help defenders (zone defenders). So in the case of Cover1, it's towards the middle of the field. In Cover2, it's away from the middle of the field. If a WR has a plus split, then use the sideline as a help defender.